2003
DOI: 10.1086/375182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Has the Optical Extragalactic Background Light Been Detected?

Abstract: A critical discussion is presented of the data analysis applied by Bernstein, Freedman, & Madore in 2002 to their measurement of the extragalactic background light. There are questionable assumptions in the analysis of the ground-based observations of the zodiacal light. The modeling of the diffuse Galactic light is based on an underestimated value of the dust column density along the line of sight. Comparison with the previously presented results from the same observations reveals a puzzling situation: in s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancy between the resolved and total EBL could be explained by a population of ultra faint and numerous galaxies at U ≥ 27, beyond the current limits of the present surveys and with a log N-log S slope steeper than 0.5, or by an improper subtraction of the foreground components, as stated in Mattila (2003) and Bernstein (2007).…”
Section: The Uv Extragalactic Background Lightmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The discrepancy between the resolved and total EBL could be explained by a population of ultra faint and numerous galaxies at U ≥ 27, beyond the current limits of the present surveys and with a log N-log S slope steeper than 0.5, or by an improper subtraction of the foreground components, as stated in Mattila (2003) and Bernstein (2007).…”
Section: The Uv Extragalactic Background Lightmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The reported values are presented in Table 2.2. It has been argued that these results are awed because of errors in the determination of the zodiacal light from their ground-based observations [175]. The applied corrections led to higher nominal uxes at the same time that the 1σ errors became so large that the reported detection has been put into question.…”
Section: Foreground Subtraction Of the Sky Brightnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Claims that the extragalactic background radiation at optical wavelengths has now been detected (Bernstein et al, 2002a,b) remain contested (Mattila 2003;Bernstein et al, 2005). The uncertainties about the intensity and spectrum of the optical extragalactic background radiation also affect the interpretation of the interpretation of the nearinfrared extragalactic background light, for which measurements were reported recently by Matsumoto et al (2005).…”
Section: Cosmic Background Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%