Hatila Vadisi Milli Parkı'nda (Artvin) yer alan farklı vejetasyon tiplerinin görsel değerlendirmesi üzerine bir çalışma

Sari, Derya; Karaşah, Banu

doi:10.18182/tjf.49219

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…2004;Val vd., 2006;Dascalu, 2011;Aksu, 2012). Mekanı oluşturan fiziksel öge ve bileşenlere doğallık özelliği kazandıran tüm unsurlar (malzeme, obje, doğal eleman varlığı, doğal fiziksel yapı vb), mekânların estetik kalitesi üzerinde pozitif etki yaratmaktadır (Karaşah ve Sarı, 2015…”

Section: Bulgularunclassified

İstinat Duvarlarının Kent Kimlik Ögesi Olarak Değerlendirilmesi –Artvin Örneği

Surat¹

2019

Planning

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Bulgularunclassified

İstinat Duvarlarının Kent Kimlik Ögesi Olarak Değerlendirilmesi –Artvin Örneği

Surat¹

2019

Planning

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In the study, weighted means were assigned to the scores given for the visual qualities of the photographs by the individual study participants. These mean values were used to determine whether or not the preferences of the participants differed according to their profession, sex, age, or educational status (Eroğlu, 2012;Sevenant et al, 2010;Akbar et al, 2002;Sarı, 2015.…”

Section: Statistical Evaluationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In order to preserve the diversity of natural landscapes, the importance of visual landscape quality as well as natural resource value must be considered (Sarı and Karaşah, 2015). Visual landscape quality is a term which emerged as a result of landscape evaluations made from the perceptual and emotional perspectives of the viewers (Kıroğlu, 2007).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determination of the Visual Preferences of Different Habitat Types

Eroğlu¹,

S²,

Tg³

et al. 2018

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The unique qualities of areas with natural landscape features help provide sustainability. Moreover, their different vegetation covers and ecosystems contribute to the preservation of their visual attraction. In recent years, the demand for natural areas has not only been seen at a recreational level, but has also become associated with the conservation and sustainability of those areas. Although the concept of sustainability is expressed from an ecological point of view, studies indicate that the visual aspect is also an important component. Thus, in this study, a visual quality assessment was carried out which considered both objective and subjective evaluations of different habitat types. Efteni lakewetland and Melen Ağzı dunes (Düzce), Anzer, Ayder, and Çat Düzü highlands (Rize), and Sultanmurat and Taşli highlands (Trabzon) were selected as the study areas. A visual quality analysis was conducted with a total of 43 participants (23 students, 16 local inhabitants and four lecturers) in order establish their preferences in areas with different landscape characteristics. For the determination of the visual qualifications of these areas, a total of 24 photographs showing typical images representing each habitat type (three photographs for each) were employed. Taking perceptual parameters into consideration, assessment of visual quality was made according to the points given to each photo by the participants. Consequently, differences in visual quality were found to be influenced by the demographic status of the participants, differences in habitat types, recreational trends and the conservation status of the habitats.

show abstract

“…Visual perception, which is used to determine the visual and aesthetic value of the landscape, has been used by many researchers in the evaluation of different spatial features. These studies are listed as follows: user perception of planting design and plant compositions studies (Acar & Ayhan Güneroğlu, 2009;Acar & Derya, 2010;Demirbaş et al, 2003;Erduran & Kabaş, 2010;Kösa, 2019;Müderrisoğlu & Eroğlu, 2006;Sakıcı et al, 2012;Tarakçı Eren et al, 2018); visual evaluation of different vegetation types (Sarı & Karaşah, 2015); visual perception of pedestrian roads (Aytaş & Uzun, 2015;A. Kaplan & Coşkun Hepcan, 2004;Rezazadeh, 2011;Tsuchiya, 2013); the effect of the visual attractiveness of urban parks on user perception (Altınçekiç & Erdönmez, 2001;Çakcı & Çelem, 2009;Karmanov & Hamel, 2009;Kurdoğlu & Üstün Topal, 2017;Mahdavinejad & Abedi, 2012;Surat, 2017;Yazıcı & Kiper, 2019); studies on the past and current situations of public spaces such as city squares (Acarlı & Kiper, 2018;Çınar & Çetindağ, 2009); evaluation of visual landscape quality of recreational areas (Özhancı & Yılmaz, 2011); quantifying user preferences with visual perception on different subjects such as landscape quality and visual assessment (Engin Dere, 2017;Hacıalioğlu et al, 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Visual Perception Evaluation with Semantic Differentiation Technique in Design Disciplines: Elazig Balakgazi Park

ÇİLEK

2023

Artium

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Visual perception studies in the public space are important in improving and developing any space’s design features. This study aims to evaluate landscape architects’ and architects’ visual perception of Balakgazi park design in the city of Elazig. Study methodology consists of four stages: (1) Determining the adjective pairs related to the feelings of pleasure, excitement, and dominance that are effective in evaluating the design; (2) Preparation of visual perception questionnaires; (3) Determination of visual perceptions with semantic differentiation technique. At this stage, the determined 18 adjective pairs were rated by the participants according to the 7-point Likert scale (1=Negative, 7=Positive). (4) Statistical analysis of the obtained data. At this stage, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to group the predominant adjective pairs in participant perceptions. MANOVA was used to determine whether the factors changed according to the socio-demographic characteristics of participants (gender, age, education level, etc.). In this study, the responses of 207 participants, 107 of them landscape architects and 98 architects, were evaluated. The data obtained from both groups were evaluated separately. The main results show that “Uninteresting-Interesting” got the lowest score (2.74), and the highest score was “Complex-Simple” (4.67) in the adjective pairs in Balakgazi park by the landscape architects. On the other hand, in architects, “Insufficient Green-Green” (3.19) has the lowest value, while the highest score is “Complex-Simple” (4.48). Landscape architects generally negatively evaluated the adjective pairs. As a result of the EFA, the adjective pairs were grouped under two-factor groups: “Excitement” and “Pleasure and Dominance” according to landscape architects. On the other hand, architects determined two-factor groups: “Excitement and Dominance” and “Excitement”. MANOVA results show that while there was no statistical difference in the determination of the factor groups according to gender and whether participants had seen the Balakgazi park (p>0.05), there were differences in their responses according to their levels of design education (p

show abstract

Hatila Vadisi Milli Parkı'nda (Artvin) yer alan farklı vejetasyon tiplerinin görsel değerlendirmesi üzerine bir çalışma

Cited by 7 publications

References 10 publications

İstinat Duvarlarının Kent Kimlik Ögesi Olarak Değerlendirilmesi –Artvin Örneği

İstinat Duvarlarının Kent Kimlik Ögesi Olarak Değerlendirilmesi –Artvin Örneği

Determination of the Visual Preferences of Different Habitat Types

Visual Perception Evaluation with Semantic Differentiation Technique in Design Disciplines: Elazig Balakgazi Park

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About