Hazard identification of contaminated sites—ranking potential toxicity of organic sediment extracts in crustacean and fish

Abstract

Background, aim, and scope It is well known that contaminated sediments represent a potential long-term source of pollutants to the aquatic environment. To protect human and ecosystem health, it is becoming common to remediate contaminated sites. However, the great cost associated with, e.g., dredging in combination with the large numbers of contaminated sites makes it crucial to pinpoint those sites that are in greatest need of remediation. In most European countries, this prioritization process has almost exclusively been based on chemical analyses of known substances; only seldom toxicity data has been considered. The main objective of the current study was therefore to develop a tool for hazard identification of sediment by ranking potential toxicity of organic sediment extracts in a crustacean and a fish. A secondary objective was to investigate the difference in potential toxicity between compounds with different polarities. Materials and methods Early life stages of the crustacean Nitocra spinipes and the fish Oncorhynchus mykiss, which represent organisms from different trophic levels (primary and secondary consumer) and with different routes of exposure (i.e., ingestion through food, diffusive uptake, and maternal transfer), were exposed to hexane and acetone fractions (semi-polar compounds) of sediment from five locations, ranging from heavily to low contaminated. Preliminary tests showed that the extracts were non-bioavailable to the crustacean when exposed via water, and the extracts were therefore loaded on silica gel. Rainbow trout embryos were exposed using nano-injection technique.Results and discussion Clear concentration-response relationships of both mortality and larval development were observed in all tests with N. spinipes. Also for rainbow trout, the observed effects (e.g., abnormality, hemorrhage, asymmetric yolk sac) followed a dose-related pattern. Interestingly, our results indicate that some of the locations contained toxic semi-polar compounds, which are normally not considered in risk assessment of sediment since they are focused on compounds isolated in the hexane fraction. Conclusions The ranking of the five sediments followed the expected pattern of potential toxicity in both organisms, i.e., sediments with known pollution history caused major effects while reference sediments caused minor effects in the two test systems. Silica gel turned out to be an excellent carrier for exposure of N. spinipes to very hydrophobic and otherwise non-bioavailable sediment extracts. Recommendations and perspectivesSince both test systems demonstrated that a substantial part of the potential toxicity was caused by semi-polar compounds in the acetone fractions, this study enlightens our poor understanding of which compounds are causing adverse effects in environmental samples. Therefore, by investigating potential toxicity (i.e., hazard identification) as a first screening step in prioritizing processes, these implications could be avoided. For proper sediment risk assessment, we however recommend w...

Biological and chemical characterization of harbour sediments from the Stockholm area

“…Notably, the basic experimental design for this sediment bioassay is the same as for the two earlier published bioassays used for testing of water-soluble substances and organic extracts (see e.g. Breitholtz et al , 2007Karlsson et al 2008). This together with the fact that N. spinipes occurs naturally in both estuarine and marine environments makes the so-called LDR test relevant for assessment of a wide range of pollutants and environments.…”

“…Historically, sediment contamination has mainly been associated with various industrial activities, and the degree of contamination has been based on concentrations of pollutants in the sediment (Stuer-Lauridsen et al 2001;Nendza 2002;DelValls et al 2004;Casado-Martínez et al 2006;Karlsson et al 2008). Many coastal regions have also suffered from the impact of boat traffic, of which, e.g.…”

The endocrine disrupting potential of sediments from the Upper Danube River (Germany) as revealed by in vitro bioassays and chemical analysis

“…Whereas there are still uncertainties regarding the direct contribution of sediment-related toxicants to these fish declines, previous investigations of sediments from this area by meta analyses and toxicity assays clearly revealed acute and specific toxic potential associated with certain local sediments (Grund et al 2010;Keiter et al 2006;Keiter et al 2008;Otte et al 2008;Seitz et al 2008). Sediments are known to accumulate and retain many pollutants released by human activities, and are well known to have the potential to negatively affect aquatic organism (reviewed by Karlsson et al (2008)). Thus, impacts on local fish populations due to the previously reported toxic potentials in certain areas of the Danube River cannot be excluded.…”

Effect-directed analysis (EDA) in aquatic ecotoxicology: state of the art and future challenges

“…Especially sediments represent important long-term sinks for many toxicants (Apitz 2008;Brils et al 2007;Bunge et al 2007;Chen and White 2004;Forstner and Salomons 2008;Karlsson et al 2008;Kase et al 2008;Keiter et al 2006), which can become bioavailable through flood events or benthic or bottomdwelling organisms (Babek et al 2008;Gerbersdorf et al 2007;Hilscherova et al 2007;Schulze et al 2007;Wolz et al 2009). Consequently, there has been an increasing awareness of the relevance of particle-bound contaminants in the environment, an aspect that has not been considered satisfactorily in classic EDA approaches.…”