OBJECTIVE -HbA 1c (A1C) is substantially determined by genetic factors not shared in common with glucose. Fractions of the variance in A1C, the glycation gap (GG; previously called the glycosylation gap) and the hemoglobin glycosylation index, correlate with diabetes complications. We therefore tested whether GG (measured A1C Ϫ A1C predicted from glycated serum proteins [GSPs]) was genetically determined and whether it accounted for the heritability of A1C.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -We conducted a classic twin study on A1C and GSP collected in 40 and 46 pairs of monozygotic and dizygotic healthy female twins, respectively. The predicted A1C was based on the regression line between A1C and GSP in a separate population spanning the pathophysiologic range.RESULTS -GG was more strongly correlated between monozygotic (r ϭ 0.65) than dizygotic (r ϭ 0.48) twins, adjusted for age and BMI. The best-fitting quantitative genetic model adjusted for age and BMI showed that 69% of population variance in GG is heritable, while the remaining 31% is due to unique environmental influences. In contrast, GSP was similarly correlated between monozygotic (r ϭ 0.55) and dizygotic (r ϭ 0.49) twins, hence not genetically determined. GG was strongly correlated to A1C (r ϭ 0.48), attributable mostly to genetic factors. About one-third of the heritability of A1C is shared with GG; the remainder is specific to A1C.CONCLUSIONS -Heritability of the GG accounts for about one-third of the heritability of A1C. By implication, there are gene(s) that preferentially affect erythrocyte lifespan or glucose and/or nonenzymatic glycation or deglycation in the intracellular, rather than extracellular, compartment.
Diabetes Care 29:1739 -1743, 2006V ariation between different measures of glycemic control within subjects with diabetes is a common clinical finding (1-4). Yudkin et al. (5) and Gould et al. (6) described persistent differences between HbA 1c (A1C) and blood glucose in nondiabetic subjects and categorized these differences as "high glycator" and "low glycator" subsets. This observation has recently led to efforts to fractionate the variance in A1C to determine whether there are components that are more closely related to glycemic control and components that seem to remain constant despite variations in glycemic control. The strategy taken to fractionate the variance in A1C has been to examine the relationship between A1C and other measures of glycemic control, including, in one instance, glycated serum proteins (GSPs) using the measure fructosamine (i.e., resulting in a measure identified as the glycation gap [GG; previously called the glycosylation gap]) and in the other instance, by the mean of capillary blood glucose measured throughout the day (yielding a measure referred to as the hemoglobin glycation index [HGI]). Cohen et al. (7) reported that the GG is reproducible over time, despite variation in glycemic control reflected in A1C and GSPs. GG correlated with the development of diabetic nephropathy in a retrospective study. McCarter ...