2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HBM4EU Chromates Study: Determinants of Exposure to Hexavalent Chromium in Plating, Welding and Other Occupational Settings

Abstract: Work-related exposures in industrial processing of chromate (chrome plating, surface treatment and welding) raise concern regarding the health risk of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)). In this study, performed under the HBM4EU project, we focused on better understanding the determinants of exposure and recognising how risk management measures (RMMs) contribute to a reduction in exposure. HBM and occupational hygiene data were collected from 399 workers and 203 controls recruited in nine European countries. Urinary… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean Cr(VI) air level for chrome platers were 1.2 µg/m 3 with only 16% of chrome platers wearing respiratory protective equipment (RPE) during plating bath operations. Whereas, the mean Cr(VI) air level was 1.6 µg/m 3 for welders, who wore RPE over 50% of the time and surface treatment workers such as paint sprayers always wore RPE and their mean Cr(VI) air level was 12.5 µg/m 3 ( HBM4EU chromates study team, 2022 , Viegas et al, 2022 ). This may indicate that the combination of the more soluble (and therefore more bioavailable) Cr(VI) the platers were exposed to and the lack of protection from RPE resulted in greater uptake, giving rise to the highest exposure as observed in biological sample results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean Cr(VI) air level for chrome platers were 1.2 µg/m 3 with only 16% of chrome platers wearing respiratory protective equipment (RPE) during plating bath operations. Whereas, the mean Cr(VI) air level was 1.6 µg/m 3 for welders, who wore RPE over 50% of the time and surface treatment workers such as paint sprayers always wore RPE and their mean Cr(VI) air level was 12.5 µg/m 3 ( HBM4EU chromates study team, 2022 , Viegas et al, 2022 ). This may indicate that the combination of the more soluble (and therefore more bioavailable) Cr(VI) the platers were exposed to and the lack of protection from RPE resulted in greater uptake, giving rise to the highest exposure as observed in biological sample results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, welders had the highest frequency of MN RET despite the lower U-Cr levels. It is known that similar Cr exposures through inhalation lead to approximately two-fold lower U-Cr levels in welders compared to Cr platers, suggesting a decreased Cr bioavailability that is present in welding fumes, which might explain the apparent discrepancy that was observed [32,72]. Due to the limited life-span of reticulocytes, the suitability of the MN RET assay for the detection of low-dose chronic exposures in occupational settings must be studied further.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the capability and validity of different biomarkers for the assessment of Cr(VI) exposure were evaluated (Santonen et al, 2022). This study has enabled us to recognise HBM as an important exposure assessment tool, to identify which exposure scenario implies higher exposure (plating, welding or other surface treatments), and which risk management measures are more effective in controlling workers' exposure (Viegas et al, 2022).…”
Section: Application In Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%