2020
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2019.2953974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Head Motion Correction Based on Filtered Backprojection in Helical CT Scanning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As resolution drastically improves, the sensitivity to patient motion and geometric misalignment becomes high and can be the limiting factor of image resolution. This increased sensitivity also challenges the assumption of smooth patient movement across views [279]- [281].…”
Section: Image Generation For Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As resolution drastically improves, the sensitivity to patient motion and geometric misalignment becomes high and can be the limiting factor of image resolution. This increased sensitivity also challenges the assumption of smooth patient movement across views [279]- [281].…”
Section: Image Generation For Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative (IBSI), data from different modalities may fit different methods for image interpolation [20]. Motion correction is an approach to remove the motion artefacts caused by uncertain motion, which is also a vital preprocessing step to obtain reconstructed images with significantly improved quality [21].…”
Section: Imaging Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autofocus methods have demonstrated successful estimation of rigid and multi-body rigid motion in CBCT for musculoskeletal imaging, 24,25 neuroimaging, [25][26][27] and cardiac applications. [28][29][30] Furthermore, recent work extended the application of autofocus to estimation of deformable abdominal motion via a multi-region approach under assumptions of local motion stationarity. 11 The performance of autofocus methods has been proven highly dependent on the suitability of the autofocus metric to the imaging task, anatomical site, and the severity and appearance of motion artifacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, estimation of motion in interventional CBCT can be achieved with autofocus methods, in which numerical optimization is used to search for motion trajectories that optimize an autofocus metric of the reconstructed volume associated with motion‐free images. Autofocus methods have demonstrated successful estimation of rigid and multi‐body rigid motion in CBCT for musculoskeletal imaging, 24,25 neuroimaging, 25–27 and cardiac applications 28–30 . Furthermore, recent work extended the application of autofocus to estimation of deformable abdominal motion via a multi‐region approach under assumptions of local motion stationarity 11 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%