2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10643-014-0640-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Head Start/Child Care Partnerships: Program Characteristics and Classroom Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trained observers rated the classroom on the 21 items that compose the abbreviated version of the ECERS‐R (Clifford et al., ), which assess the quality of teacher–child interactions and the quality of physical aspects of the classroom to support learning on a 7‐point scale ranging from “inadequate” to “excellent”. This measure has been used previously to assess classroom quality in Head Start classrooms (Abbott‐Shim, Lambert, & McCarty, ; McCoy, Connors, Morris, Yoshikawa, & Friedman‐Krauss, ; Schilder & Leavell, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trained observers rated the classroom on the 21 items that compose the abbreviated version of the ECERS‐R (Clifford et al., ), which assess the quality of teacher–child interactions and the quality of physical aspects of the classroom to support learning on a 7‐point scale ranging from “inadequate” to “excellent”. This measure has been used previously to assess classroom quality in Head Start classrooms (Abbott‐Shim, Lambert, & McCarty, ; McCoy, Connors, Morris, Yoshikawa, & Friedman‐Krauss, ; Schilder & Leavell, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We operationalize mimetic forces by identifying affirmative responses from interviewees on at least one of three dimensions: (1) prior work history with public preschool in a different community where IOR activities were established, (2) prior work history with the “other” public preschool (Head Start or VPI) from where they are currently employed, and (3) report of environmental scan techniques to investigate possible interorganizational activities between Head Start and VPI. Finally, publicly funded preschools in the U.S. have received a consistent message from many early childhood experts that collaboration between programs is a valuable venture in which programs should participate (Schilder & Leavell, 2015; Sowa, 2009; Wat & Gayl, 2009). We operationalize normative pressures by identifying affirmative responses on at least one of three dimensions that echo the rationales behind collaboration in the broader preschool field: (1) discussions of increasing preschool access for why they collaborate, (2) discussion of increasing overall preschool quality for why they collaborate, and (3) discussion of increasing overall equity for community children for why they collaborate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%