2021
DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Head‐to‐head comparison of contemporary heart failure risk scores

Abstract: Several heart failure (HF) web-based risk scores are currently used in clinical practice. Currently, we lack head-to-head comparison of the accuracy of risk scores. This study aimed to assess correlation and mortality prediction performance of Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC-HF) risk score, which includes clinical variables + medications; Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM), which includes clinical variables + treatments + analytes; PARADIGM Risk of Events and Death in the Contempora… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the investigation did not pursue the MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events) in older HFmrEF patients. Previous research has verified the role of MAGGIC score in predicting the mortality of HF [ 10 , 11 ]. As the relationship between MAGGIC score and EPC function is revealed by our study, it can be inferred that EPC function may be valuable in predicting the prognosis of HFmrEF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, the investigation did not pursue the MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events) in older HFmrEF patients. Previous research has verified the role of MAGGIC score in predicting the mortality of HF [ 10 , 11 ]. As the relationship between MAGGIC score and EPC function is revealed by our study, it can be inferred that EPC function may be valuable in predicting the prognosis of HFmrEF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…HFmrEF accounts for 10–24.2% of HF patients [ 6 8 ] and has an all-cause mortality 2–3 times higher in the elderly [ 9 ]. The Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) score includes 13 independent predictors of mortality and predicts the 1- and 3-year all-cause mortality of HF [ 10 , 11 ]. Although many studies have examined the characteristics of HFmrEF since it was first named in the 2016 ESC guidelines [ 5 ], the effect of aging on MAGGIC score in HFmrEF patients is still unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physicians are inaccurate in their expected life predictions for terminally ill patients and the error is systematically optimistic, thus affecting the quality of care given to patients near the end of life. None of the contemporary risk scores shows a clear superiority over the others ( 15 ). Barcelona Bio-Heart Failure (BCN-Bio-HF) calculator provides the best discrimination and overall performance but tends to overestimate the risk.…”
Section: Prognosis Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Several prognostic risk models of HF have been developed in recent years, but only a few have been externally validated, and even fewer include cardiac biomarkers known to refine death risk prediction in HF patients. A recent head-to-head comparison of contemporary HF risk scores suggested that natriuretic peptides add value to HF risk stratification tools ( 14 ). The incorporation of biomarkers in HF scores may not only improve discrimination at baseline, but also reflect changes in mortality risk over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%