2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.046
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Head-to-Head Comparison of Left Ventricular Function Assessment with 64-Row Computed Tomography, Biplane Left Cineventriculography, and Both 2- and 3-Dimensional Transthoracic Echocardiography

Abstract: 64-row CT may be more accurate than CVG, 2D Echo, and 3D Echo in comparison with MRI as the reference standard for assessment of global LV function.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
113
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
5
113
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the 2 methods were both shown in the second phase. 43,44 Second, in this study, we did not observe an increased MVO, as assessed by CFR, after eMSC infusion. However, variability in heart rate and arterial blood pressure might interfere with reliable CFR measurement.…”
Section: Study Limitationscontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Therefore, the 2 methods were both shown in the second phase. 43,44 Second, in this study, we did not observe an increased MVO, as assessed by CFR, after eMSC infusion. However, variability in heart rate and arterial blood pressure might interfere with reliable CFR measurement.…”
Section: Study Limitationscontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…MR shows great accuracy in the determination of functional parameters such as LV volumes, mass, ejection fraction, regional wall motion, and myocardial thickening (5). Although CT-based assessment of LV function correlates well with MR, radiation exposure to the patient still represents a major issue (6).…”
Section: Strengths and Weaknesses Of Mr Versus Ct As An Adjunct To Petmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of difference actually suggests that TTE is not able to accurately measure the maximal aortic diameter. The limited ability of TTE to obtain the largest diameter is expected due to its limited latitude to choose the [13]. The absence of difference between inner-to-inner maximal diameter measured with CT and leading edge-to-leading edge maximal diameter measured with 2D TTE in our study may therefore reflect the compensation of two systematic differences: one due to the aortic wall thickness and the other due to the different angle of incidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%