Headline indicators for monitoring the performance of health systems: findings from the european Health Systems_Indicator (euHS_I) survey

Abstract

BackgroundCross-country comparisons of health system performance have become increasingly important. Clear evidence is needed on the prioritization of health system performance assessment (HSPA) indicators. Selected “leading” or “headline” HSPA indicators may provide early warnings of policy impacts. The goal of this paper is to propose a set of headline indicators to frame and describe health system performance.MethodsWe identified overlaps and gaps in the availability of reported indicators by looking at HSPA initiatives in Member States (MSs) of the European Union (EU), the European Commission as well as international institutions (e.g. OECD, WHO-EUR). On that basis, we conducted a two-stage online survey, the european Health System_Indicator (euHS_I) survey. The survey sought to elicit preferences from a wide range of HSPA experts on i) the most relevant HSPA domain(s), i.e. access, efficiency, quality of care, equity, for a specific indicator, and ii) the importance of indicators regarding their information content, i.e. headline, operational, explanatory. Frequency analysis was performed.ResultsWe identified 2168 health and health system indicators listed in 43 relevant initiatives. After adjusting for overlaps, a total of 361 indicators were assessed by 28 experts in the 1st stage of the survey. In the 2nd stage, a more balanced set of 95 indicators was constructed and assessed by 72 experts from 22 EU MSs and 3 non-EU countries. In the domain access experts assessed share of population covered by health insurance as the top headline indicator. In the domain efficiency, the highest rank was given to Total health care expenditure by all financing agents, and in the domain quality of care to rate of hospital-acquired infections. Percentage of households experiencing high levels/catastrophic of out-of-pocket health expenditures results as the top headline indicator for domain equity.ConclusionsHSPA indicators from different initiatives largely overlap and public health indicators dominate over health systems aspects. The survey allowed to quantify overlaps and gaps in HSPA indicators, their expert allocation to domain areas and establishment of an informed hierarchy structure. Yet, results show that more multidisciplinary work is needed to ensure the availability of accurate efficiency indicators which are comparable across countries.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13690-018-0278-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Integrating the Population Perspective into Health System Performance Assessment (IPHA): Study Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Study in Germany Linking Survey and Claims Data of Statutorily and Privately Insured

“…The indicator “unmet healthcare need” has become the dominant measure of access internationally. 33 In the present study, it is operationalised by asking participants if they have experienced any situation within the past twelve months in which they did not seek healthcare because of (1) waiting time, (2) distance or problems with transportation, or (3) financial reasons. To assess the level of unmet need due to financial reasons in more detail, participants are given a list of healthcare services (eg, medical aids, dental treatment) to specify the kind of care they did not seek.…”

Food Insecurity Measurement: Stakeholder Comparisons of the EU-SILC and HFSSM Indicators and Considerations Towards the Usefulness of a Headline Indicator

“…X X X EU-SILC-4 questions X X X X X defined as a quantifiable measurement approach or monitoring tool which can be used to track progress towards strategic targets (e.g. health system performance or policy impacts) and to facilitate comparisons across areas and time periods (Perić et al, 2018). Fuel poverty in NI has an identified and widely-used indicator, with households indicated to be experiencing fuel poverty if they spend more than 10% of household income on heating the home (DECC, 2019).…”

Developing an index of sustainable development goals for local governments: the case of Gyeonggi province in korea

“…Accordingly, core targets and indicators that they should jointly implement were selected. A set of headline indicators are useful as a monitoring tool to track and explain progress of SDGs at the regional and local level and provide a reference framework to identify priorities for policy action (Pinter et al 2005;Lafortune et al 2020;Perić et al 2018). The shared SDGs indicators also promote mutual learning and accountability by allowing municipalities to compare performance with each other.…”