2022
DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v36i10.21398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HEAL: A Knowledge Graph for Distress Management Conversations

Abstract: The demands of the modern world are increasingly responsible for causing psychological burdens and bringing adverse impacts on our mental health. As a result, neural conversational agents with empathetic responding and distress management capabilities have recently gained popularity. However, existing end-to-end empathetic conversational agents often generate generic and repetitive empathetic statements such as "I am sorry to hear that", which fail to convey specificity to a given situation. Due to the lack of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Knowledge graph-guided conversations Question answering using KG is seeing tremendous interest from AI and NLP community through various technological improvements in query understanding, query rewriting, knowledge retrieval, question generation, response shaping, and others (Wang et al, 2017). For example, the HEAL KG developed by Welivita and Pu (2022b) allows LLMs to enhance their empathetic responses by incorporating empathy, expectations, affect, stressors, and feedback types from distressing conversations. By leveraging HEAL, the model identifies a suitable phrase from the user's query, effectively tailoring its response.…”
Section: Knowledge-infused Learning (Kil)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge graph-guided conversations Question answering using KG is seeing tremendous interest from AI and NLP community through various technological improvements in query understanding, query rewriting, knowledge retrieval, question generation, response shaping, and others (Wang et al, 2017). For example, the HEAL KG developed by Welivita and Pu (2022b) allows LLMs to enhance their empathetic responses by incorporating empathy, expectations, affect, stressors, and feedback types from distressing conversations. By leveraging HEAL, the model identifies a suitable phrase from the user's query, effectively tailoring its response.…”
Section: Knowledge-infused Learning (Kil)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Welivita et al (2021) produced EDOS by fine-tuning RoBERTa on a small label set created through crowdsourcing, and then used it to label 1 million conversations in the Opensubtitles dataset (Lison et al, 2018). Similarly, Welivita and Pu (2022) created HEAL -a knowledge graph consisting of 1 million distress narratives, annotated for emotion, post summarization, and node clustering using a variety of pre-existing models. A prevalent shortcoming of emotion labeling with current models is their limited accuracy; the emotion classifiers utilized in both HEAL and EDOS only achieved accuracies ranging from 65% to 65.88%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to context-specific responses, we find that some generic responses such as "I'm sorry to 1 github.com/declare-lab/exemplary-empathy hear that" can also appease users. So our model introduces a knowledge graph HEAL 2 [35] involving user feedback for distress management conversations. It consists of five types of nodes: (1) stressors: the cause of distress, such as suicidal ideation; (2) expectations: questions asked by the speakers usually; (3) response types: the most common types of responses given by the listeners with different stressors, such as "I understand how you feel.…”
Section: Exemplar Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides empathizing with users, some approaches aim to elicit the user's positive emotions (i.e., emotion elicitation dialog system [21]), especially under some specific situations that need emo- tional intervention, e.g., depression treatment and complaint handling [6,35]. This scenario requires the systems to take the user feedback into account dynamically at every dialog turn and then generate an encouraging response when a negative emotion is identified from the user side.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation