Health and equity in all policies in local government: processes and outcomes in two Norwegian municipalities

Abstract

Aims: To identify key factors in implementing Health and Equity in All Policies (HEiAP) at the local level in two Norwegian municipalities in order to accelerate the progress of promoting health, well-being and equity in other local governments. Approach: This case study is presented as a narrative from policy-making processes in two Norwegian municipalities. The story is told from an insider perspective, with a focus on HEiAP policy makers in these two municipalities. Results: The narrative identified key learning from implementing HEiAP at the local level, i.e. the importance of strengthening system and human capacities. System capacity is strengthened by governing HEiAP according to national legislation and a holistic governance system at the local level. Municipal plans are based on theory, evidence and local data. A 'main story' is developed to support the vision, defining joint societal goals and co-creation strategies. Policies are anchored by measuring and monitoring outcomes, sharing accountability and continuous dialogue to ensure political commitment. Human capacity is strengthened through participatory leadership, soft skills and health promotion competences across sectors. Health promotion competence at a strategic level in the organization, participation in professional networks, crowd sourcing toward common goals, and commitment through winning hearts and minds of politicians and other stakeholders are vital aspects. Conclusions: Our experience pinpoints the importance of strengthening system and human capacity in local governments. Further, we found it important to focus on the two strategic objectives in the European strategy 'Health 2020': (1) Improving health for all and reducing health inequalities; (2) improving leadership and participatory governance for health.

The role of local and regional authorities in prevention and control of NCDs: the case of Poland

“…Local and regional self-governments are also independent in the scope of creating pro-health living conditions for local communities, managing the local health care system, supporting preventive examinations, and are able to finance specific activities related to the promotion of physical and health activities, and pro-health attitudes (e.g. a healthy food fair) [36]. In negative terms, consisting of preventing NCDs, local self-government bodies may create acts of local law that limit the scope of rights and freedoms granted to individuals (e.g.…”

Intersectoral Planning for Public Health: Dilemmas and Challenges

“…The use of soft skills when implementing HiAP is only vaguely discussed in the literature; however, soft skills such as humility, trust, openness and patience are recognized as essential by other practitioners. 48-50 Despite recognizing that structures such as HIAs and annual reporting might be experienced by some as imposed or enforced, the informants in our study also acknowledge that these structures are important implementation and development tools to raise awareness, authority and status. According to Davoudi, 14 and contrary to the conventional portrayal of rules and regulations as fixed and rigid inhibitors of creativity, they are also dynamic features that might simultaneously represent opportunities, innovation and change.…”

Feeling Valued and Adding Value: A Participatory Action Research Project on Co-creating Practices of Social Inclusion in Kindergartens and Communities

“…The study is based in a Norwegian mid-size municipality with ∼20,000 inhabitants. Since 2014, this municipality had adopted public health and equity in health and well-being as main policy goals in their masterplan, where co-creation was a key strategy [see (64) for details of this policy process]. Thus, the current study is rooted in a local analysis of public health policy priorities in the municipality, in accordance with legislative demands.…”