2018
DOI: 10.1177/1559827618790531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health and Wellness Coaching: Providers and Practice—A Commentary on Sforzo and Colleagues (2018)

Abstract: The field of health and wellness coaching holds great promise for making health behavior change interventions available to more individuals. We assert that the health and wellness literature should recognize the potential of lay persons to provide health coaching and lay person health coach studies should be included in the compendium compiled by Sforzo and colleagues. Limiting the field to current health professionals decreases the number of potential coaches unnecessarily. The compendium will be an excellent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, a recently published commentary opined strongly for dropping "health care professional" from our list of HWC article inclusion criteria. 37 A good case made by these authors came too late for consideration in this Addendum, though we will deliberate on coaching qualifications criteria for future addendums to the Compendium. We also remind readers that a publication bias likely exists in the HWC literature, leading to more positive than negative findings being published and reviewed.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a recently published commentary opined strongly for dropping "health care professional" from our list of HWC article inclusion criteria. 37 A good case made by these authors came too late for consideration in this Addendum, though we will deliberate on coaching qualifications criteria for future addendums to the Compendium. We also remind readers that a publication bias likely exists in the HWC literature, leading to more positive than negative findings being published and reviewed.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%