Health care disparities and chronic rhinosinusitis: Does neighborhood disadvantage impact outcomes in sinonasal disease?

Abstract

ObjectiveSocioeconomic status (SES) is linked to health outcomes but has not been well studied in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The area deprivation index (ADI) is a comprehensive measure of geographic SES that ranks neighborhood disadvantage. This investigation used ADI to understand the impact of neighborhood disadvantage on CRS treatment outcomes.MethodsA total of 642 study participants with CRS were prospectively enrolled and self‐selected endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) or continued appropriate medical therapy as treatment. The 22‐item SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22) and Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire Short‐Form 6‐D (SF‐6D) health utility value scores were recorded pre‐ and post‐treatment. Using residence zip codes, national ADI scores were retrospectively assigned to patients. Spearman's correlation coefficients (Rs) and Cramer's V effect size (φc) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.ResultsA history of ESS was associated with significantly worse ADI scores compared to no history of ESS (φc = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.25; p < 0.001). Baseline total SNOT‐22 (Rs = 0.14; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.22; p < 0.001) and SF‐6D values (Rs = −0.20; 95% CI: −0.27, −0.12; p < 0.001) were significantly negatively correlated with national ADI rank. No significant correlations between ADI and within‐subject improvement, or achievement of >1 minimal clinically important difference, in SNOT‐22 or SF‐6D scores after treatment were found.ConclusionsGeographic socioeconomic deprivation was associated with worse baseline disease severity and history of prior surgical intervention. However, ADI did not correlate with improvement in disease‐specific outcomes. The impact of socioeconomic deprivation on outcomes in CRS requires further investigation.