Health Care for People with Disabilities in the Unified Health System in Brazil: A Scoping Review

Abstract

People with disabilities have greater need for healthcare on average, but often face barriers when accessing these services. The Brazilian government launched the National Health Policy for People with Disabilities (PNSPD) in 2002 to address this inequality. PNSPD has six areas of focus: quality of life, impairment prevention, comprehensive health care, organization and functioning of health services, information mechanisms, and training of human resources. The aim of this article was to undertake a scoping review to assess the evidence on the experience of people with disabilities in Brazil with respect to the six themes of the PNSPD. The scoping review included articles published between 2002 and 2019, from four electronic databases: PUBMED/MEDLINE, LILACS, Science Direct, and Scielo. In total, 8076 articles were identified, and after review of titles, abstracts, and full texts by two independent reviewers, 98 were deemed eligible for inclusion. The evidence was relatively limited in availability and scope. However, it consistently showed large gaps in delivery of healthcare to people with disabilities across the six dimensions considered. There was lack of actions aimed at promoting quality of life; insufficient professional training about disability; little evidence on the health profile of people with disabilities; large gaps in the availability of care due to widespread physical, informational, and attitudinal barriers; and poor distribution of the supply and integration of services. In conclusion, the policy framework in Brazil is supportive of the inclusion of people with disabilities in health services; however, large inequalities remain due to poor implementation of the policy into practice.

Equilibrium of Tiered Healthcare Resources during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China: A Case Study of Taiyuan, Shanxi Province

“…Healthcare is one of the basic tasks of modern countries. Scholars in Japan, Poland, Austria, and Brazil have investigated and analyzed the allocation of healthcare resources in their countries, and it is proposed that the quantity of healthcare resources is balanced and that healthcare resource utilization is optimized [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ].…”

Emergency Department, Hospices and Brazil

“…Even though the Brazilian Unified Healthcare System (Sistema Único de Saúde -SUS -in Portuguese) started in the 1980s, it is still a development project . 1 Emergency Departments (ED) and Family Medicine (FM) are the two main access doors to SUS, but it is still mainly a hospitalocentric system, based on the Flexner model proposed in the EUA in the beginning of the last century. 2 The major hospitals are restricted to cities with more than 200,000 inhabitants and almost 70% of the Brazilian cities has less than 30,000 inhabitants.…”

Establishing a Cancer Rehabilitation Service in a Middle-Income Country: an Experience from Brazil

“…Rehabilitation services are offered in all levels of healthcare. At the primary level, care is provided by Family Health Teams that provide education, orient the use of assistive technology, and provide community-based rehabilitation, among a spectrum of different services [ 12 ]. At the secondary level, rehabilitation care is provided at dedicated rehabilitation facilities, where more specific rehabilitation interventions are provided, including provision of assistive technologies [ 12 ].…”

“…At the primary level, care is provided by Family Health Teams that provide education, orient the use of assistive technology, and provide community-based rehabilitation, among a spectrum of different services [ 12 ]. At the secondary level, rehabilitation care is provided at dedicated rehabilitation facilities, where more specific rehabilitation interventions are provided, including provision of assistive technologies [ 12 ]. The primary and secondary levels are responsible for longitudinal rehabilitation care, caring for the subacute/chronic rehabilitation phase, occupational and social reintegration, supported by multi-professional teams and home-based activities among others.…”

“…At the tertiary level, rehabilitation care is provided in a more specialized manner, for instance, in cancer or stroke centers [ 12 ]. Some of the challenges for providing rehabilitation in the SUS are the chronic public underfunding in rehabilitation care and the need for more rehabilitation specialists [ 12 ].…”