Health care professionals’ attitudes towards evidence-based medicine in the workers’ compensation setting: a cohort study

Abstract

BackgroundProblems may arise during the approval process of treatment after a compensable work injury, which include excess paperwork, delays in approving services, disputes, and allegations of over-servicing. This is perceived as undesirable for injured people, health care professionals and claims managers, and costly to the health care system, compensation system, workplaces and society. Introducing an Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) decision tool in the workers’ compensation system could provide a partial solution, by reducing uncertainty about effective treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate attitudes of health care professionals (HCP) to the potential implementation of an EBM tool in the workers’ compensation setting.MethodsThe study has a mixed methods design. The quantitative study consisted of an online questionnaire asking about self-reported knowledge, attitudes and behaviour to EBM in general. The qualitative study consisted of interviews about an EBM tool being applied in the workers’ compensation process. Participants were health care practitioners from different clinical specialties. They were recruited through the investigators’ clinical networks and the workers’ compensation government regulator’s website.ResultsParticipants completing the questionnaire (n = 231) indicated they were knowledgeable about the evidence-base in their field, but perceived some difficulties when applying EBM. General practitioners reported having the greatest obstacles to applying EBM. Participants who were interviewed (n = 15) perceived that an EBM tool in the workers’ compensation setting could potentially have some advantages, such as reducing inappropriate treatment, or over-servicing, and providing guidance for clinicians. However, participants expressed substantial concerns that the EBM tool would not adequately reflect the impact of psychosocial factors on recovery. They also highlighted a lack of timeliness in decision making and proper assessment, particularly in pain management.ConclusionsOverall, HCP are supportive of EBM, but have strong concerns about implementation of EBM based decision making in the workers’ compensation setting. The participants felt that an EBM tool should not be applied rigidly and should take into account clinical judgement and patient variability and preferences. In general, the treatment approval process in the workers’ compensation insurance system is a sensitive area, in which the interaction between HCP and claims managers can be improved.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0460-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Usefulness and feasibility of comprehensive and less comprehensive vocational rehabilitation for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: perspectives from patients, professionals, and managers

“…This number of interviews is sufficient and is comparable with other qualitative studies [37][38][39][40]. In the present study, data saturation of each stakeholder group was reached, which strengthens the findings and implications.…”

Psychologists’ Application of Clinical Guidelines and Recommended Protocols and Procedures within State Insurance Regulatory Authority Insurance Frameworks: Outcomes for Injured Patients with Musculoskeletal Injuries

“…Psychologists’ variable application of the SIRA treatment guidelines is consistent with the findings of other studies showing considerable variability in practitioners’ use of EBP in mental health settings (Nelson & Steele, ). This is despite practitioners’ self‐reported perception that they adhere to EBP approximately 82% of the time (Elbers et al, ). Combined, these findings suggest a mismatch between psychologists’ beliefs about their practice and their actions.…”

Evidence needs, training demands, and opportunities for knowledge translation in social security and insurance medicine: A European survey

“…A more recent survey in the workers’ compensation setting investigated the attitudes of Australian health professionals towards using electronic EBM guidance by an US company for decision-making ( 19 – 21 ). Positive feedback referred to specific recommendations on issues such as treatment intensity (e.g.…”