Health Consensus

Monguet, Josep María; Trejo, Álex; Martí, Tino; Escarrabill, Joan

doi:10.4018/ijudh.2017010103

Cited by 11 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The DM is a group consensus technique that employs a systematic study of research, stakeholder opinions, and the judgment of experts in an area to establish an agreement after numerous rounds of discussions ( Monguet et al., 2017 ). The DM is beneficial when evidence is insufficient or limited: it depends on group members' “collective intelligence” to create better outcomes than any individual in the group could achieve on his or her own, resulting in greater content validity and reliability ( Sullivan, 2011 ; Zielskea and Held, 2021 ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Constructing internal audit quality evaluation index: evidence from listed companies in Jiangsu province, China

Ren

Kong

Ntarmah

et al. 2022

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Constructing internal audit quality evaluation index: evidence from listed companies in Jiangsu province, China

Ren

Kong

Ntarmah

et al. 2022

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Data was collected between August and October 2020 through a digital questionnaire on Google Forms ® , shared via blind carbon copy emails, ensuring participants' confidentiality. 34 The collected data included only the participants' e-mail addresses as potentially identifiable information, to avoid repeated answers. In all rounds of discussion, the participants provided their voluntary and informed consent to the study's objectives, data collection, and analysis.…”

Section: Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Strategic Communication for Local Public Health Services in Portugal: A Delphi Study

Vital Brito

2024

Acta Med Port

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Strategic communication plays a decisive role in public health planning and project implementation. However, Portuguese Local Public Health Units, which are responsible for community interventions, still lack guidance models, tools, specialized resources, and training in health communication. The aim of this study was to develop a conceptual model of strategic organizational communication for local public health services, in Portugal.Methods: This study presents a conceptual model of strategic organizational communication for Local Public Health Units, which was developed through a three-round, modified Delphi online panel. Thirty-seven Portuguese specialists in public health, communication, and community members were invited to analyse a proposed framework, based on an up-to-date literature review. High retention rates were observed in all rounds (first = 22 valid participations;second = 21 valid participations; third = 18 valid participations).Results: Most participants believed that Portuguese Public Health Units were not prepared to communicate effectively and that they would benefit from adequate planning and identification of a communication lead or team. Websites and social media were also identified as essential for effective communication. The validated conceptual model integrated different partners in health and in the community, with emphasis on the relationships with the national network of health authorities, other Public Health Units, primary health care units, municipalities, and schools. The preferred channels identified for communicating with these partners included interpersonal relationships, email, and mobile phone. No consensus was obtained for preferred communication channels between Local Public Health Units and the media.Conclusion: Strategic planning based on the proposed conceptual model involving different stakeholders, has potential to improve the effectiveness of internal and external communication and facilitate the implementation of public health programs and projects. The proposed model needs to be validated in Local Public Health Units, considering the potential human, material, and financial constraints.

show abstract

“…However, potential bias also increases with experts' fatigue or attrition. Therefore, mean scores ≥ 0.70 and CV ≤ 25% were set as the consensus level in the present study (Monguet et al, 2017).…”

Section: Materials and Consultationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of the First Value Assessment Index System for Off-Label Use of Antineoplastic Agents in China: A Delphi Study

Jiang

Zeng

et al. 2020

Front. Pharmacol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To develop the first value assessment index system for off-label use of antineoplastic agents in China. Methods: A modified two-round Delphi method was employed to establish consensus within a field to reach agreement via a questionnaire or doing interview among a multidisciplinary panel of experts by collecting their feedback to inform the next round, exchanging their individual knowledge, experience, and opinions anonymously, and resolving uncertainties. Results: Expert's positive coefficient was 94.74% in the first round and 100.00% in the second round. In the first round, expert's authority coefficient for a majority of 61 indicators was ≥ 0.80 (85.2%, ranging from 0.70 to 0.89, mean=0.84) and coefficient of variation for all the 61 indicators was ≥ 22% (ranging from 11.67% to 21.74%, mean=17.4%). In two rounds, the mean expert's authority coefficient raised to 0.85 (ranging from 0.75 to 0.90), and coefficient of variation for all indicators was < 20% (ranging from 10.49% to 19.71%, mean=15.97%). The P-values of Kendall's W test were all < 0.001 for each round. At the end of two rounds, W-value for concordance was 0.395 (c 2 =347.494, P<0.0001). The final value assessment index system comprised of eight domains, 21 subdomains, and 56 indicators. The weight and combination weight of each domain were 0.4211 for therapeutic value, 0.1678 for source and type of evidence, 0.0961 for public feedback/ comments, 0.0894 for novelty in drug discovery, 0.0689 for grading of evidence recommendation, 0.0578 for consistency of evidence results, 0.0561 for disease burden, and 0.0428 for ratio of composition/integration. Conclusion: Use of Delphi method to develop the proposed value assessment index system was found scientific and credible. This value assessment index system is highly appropriate for off-label use of antineoplastic agents in China.

show abstract

Health Consensus

Cited by 11 publications

References 48 publications

Constructing internal audit quality evaluation index: evidence from listed companies in Jiangsu province, China

Constructing internal audit quality evaluation index: evidence from listed companies in Jiangsu province, China

Strategic Communication for Local Public Health Services in Portugal: A Delphi Study

Development of the First Value Assessment Index System for Off-Label Use of Antineoplastic Agents in China: A Delphi Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About