2014
DOI: 10.4103/0970-0218.132719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health impact assessment: Need and future scope in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of recommendations emerged as a major methodological problem in this review. Literature supports that bad delivery or report of recommendations influence the integration of HIA in policy making [40,131,132,133]. Davenport et al (2005) found that providing realistic and non-controversial recommendations, fitting in political timeframes, are important enablers to the integration of HIA findings into the decision-making process [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of recommendations emerged as a major methodological problem in this review. Literature supports that bad delivery or report of recommendations influence the integration of HIA in policy making [40,131,132,133]. Davenport et al (2005) found that providing realistic and non-controversial recommendations, fitting in political timeframes, are important enablers to the integration of HIA findings into the decision-making process [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Davenport et al (2005) found that providing realistic and non-controversial recommendations, fitting in political timeframes, are important enablers to the integration of HIA findings into the decision-making process [40]. Harris et al (2014) go further by stating that adequate recommendations define whether HIA becomes relevant and absorbed into policy decision-making [133]. Even further, authors of a previous HIA evaluation study excluded upfront cases with no clear recommendations and considered the latter a pre-requisite to scientifically relevant HIAs [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%