2001
DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-37.3.413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Health Protocol for Translocation of Free-Ranging Elk

Abstract: When considering an elk (Cervus elaphus) restoration program, wildlife managers must evaluate the positive and negative elements of translocation. We prepared this protocol to give an overview of health considerations associated with translocation of elk, with an emphasis on movement of free-ranging elk from western North America to the southeastern USA. We evaluated infectious agents and ectoparasites reported in elk from two perspectives. First, we made a qualitative estimate of the ability of the agent to b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison, a health protocol for translocation of free ranging elk, Cervus elaphus, identified 190 infectious agents and ectoparasites reported in the species (Corn and Nettles, 2001). Complete and standardized postmortem examination of all dead animals from threatened or endangered populations serves as an excellent first step in gathering information about infectious diseases in the population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, a health protocol for translocation of free ranging elk, Cervus elaphus, identified 190 infectious agents and ectoparasites reported in the species (Corn and Nettles, 2001). Complete and standardized postmortem examination of all dead animals from threatened or endangered populations serves as an excellent first step in gathering information about infectious diseases in the population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a few detailed publications on health protocols for translocating wildlife, such as the article on health protocols for translocation of freeranging elk (Corn and Nettles, 2001). Mathews et al (2006) argue that baseline data on the health status of reintroduced animals and extant populations are rarely published.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistically, the theoretical upper limits of prevalence of these diseases based on our small sample size can be estimated as follows (assuming a 95% confidence level and 100% sensitivity and specificity for each test; Corn and Nettles, 1995): CWD #4% in Arkansas and #17% in Kentucky; B. abortus#1.7% Arkansas, #10% Kentucky; M. bovis#10% AR, #11% Kentucky. Limitations in the sensitivity and specificity of each assay curb the level of confidence of these prevalence estimates, but the extent of these limitations is difficult to quantify as most assays have not been validated in wildlife.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organisms targeted were those thought to be of potential risk for introduction into the southeastern USA, and/or known to have pathologic consequences for free-ranging and captive wildlife and livestock (Corn and Nettles, 2001). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%