2010
DOI: 10.1097/00004583-201002000-00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Healthy Adolescentsʼ Neural Response to Reward: Associations With Puberty, Positive Affect, and Depressive Symptoms

Abstract: Objective Changes in reward-related behavior are an important component of normal adolescent affective development. Understanding the neural underpinnings of these normative changes creates a foundation for investigating adolescence as a period of vulnerability to affective disorders, substance use disorders, and health problems. Studies of reward-related brain function have revealed conflicting findings regarding developmental change in the reactivity of the striatum and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
140
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
140
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, these data suggest that, although adolescents may not neurobiologically differ from adults during the anticipation of punishment (responses to aversive cues), regions that process aversive outcomes are actually more engaged in the consummatory component (delivery of aversive liquid). This adds to the growing literature suggesting that a more nuanced interpretation regarding developmental responses to reward is warranted (Bjork et al, 2011;Forbes et al, 2010;Geier et al, 2010). Geier and Luna (2011) report that temporally distinct stages of reward processing show unique developmental profiles in which the VS showed attenuated and heightened activation patterns during cue assessment and reward anticipation, respectively, in adolescents versus adults .…”
Section: Greater Striatal Sensitivity To Delivery But Not Anticipatimentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Instead, these data suggest that, although adolescents may not neurobiologically differ from adults during the anticipation of punishment (responses to aversive cues), regions that process aversive outcomes are actually more engaged in the consummatory component (delivery of aversive liquid). This adds to the growing literature suggesting that a more nuanced interpretation regarding developmental responses to reward is warranted (Bjork et al, 2011;Forbes et al, 2010;Geier et al, 2010). Geier and Luna (2011) report that temporally distinct stages of reward processing show unique developmental profiles in which the VS showed attenuated and heightened activation patterns during cue assessment and reward anticipation, respectively, in adolescents versus adults .…”
Section: Greater Striatal Sensitivity To Delivery But Not Anticipatimentioning
confidence: 83%
“…(2015) reported a peak in reward activity around age 17 years when testing a sample range of 8 to 27 years old. That said, this study joins several others in their failure to identify adolescent-elevated reward reactivity in the ventral striatum (May et al ., 2004; Forbes et al ., 2010). This could suggest that developmental trends in reward processing are subtler than previously appreciated (Sherman et al ., 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…number of selections) of the control group showed no statistical differences between men and women ( t s <1.25). Nevertheless, there have been studies showing a modulatory role of sex hormones in neural responses to winning in a monetary reward leaning task [38,39,40]. A follow-up study on a larger scale is required to address the contribution of gender, sex hormones, and their interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%