2021
DOI: 10.1017/s1368980021000677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Healthy eating: a matter of prioritisation by households or policymakers?

Abstract: I reflect upon the potential reasons why American low-income households do not spend an optimal proportion of their food budgets on fruits and vegetables, even though this would allow them to meet the recommended levels of fruit and vegetable consumption. Other priorities than health, automatic decision-making processes and access to healthy foods play a role, but solutions for the persistent socioeconomic inequalities in diet should be sought in the wider food system which promotes cheap, mass-produced foods.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, we must admit that Hypothesis 2 is confirmed only for higher-value meat and dairy products, fruits, and vegetables, while for cereals, roots, and pulses, the relationship between X 4–7 and Y n is weaker. This agrees with Stewart et al [ 134 ] and Mackenbach [ 27 ], who recently linked the consumption of fruits and vegetables with the way households prioritize healthy eating. According to the FAO [ 3 ], the availability of fruits and vegetables in low-income and lower-middle-income has substantially increased since the 1990s, but it remains far below the 400 g/capita/day consumption target established by the WHO [ 135 , 136 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, we must admit that Hypothesis 2 is confirmed only for higher-value meat and dairy products, fruits, and vegetables, while for cereals, roots, and pulses, the relationship between X 4–7 and Y n is weaker. This agrees with Stewart et al [ 134 ] and Mackenbach [ 27 ], who recently linked the consumption of fruits and vegetables with the way households prioritize healthy eating. According to the FAO [ 3 ], the availability of fruits and vegetables in low-income and lower-middle-income has substantially increased since the 1990s, but it remains far below the 400 g/capita/day consumption target established by the WHO [ 135 , 136 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Concerning healthy eating, this means that budgetary constraints could result in intuitive consumption decisions based on prices or physical availability of certain foods rather than their health benefits. Mackenbach [ 27 ] and Jetter et al [ 28 ] acknowledge that the recognition of systematic determinants of food choices inspired by affordability and availability factors is crucial in understanding food supply patterns in poorer communities. Although some scholars have advocated for considering the systemic interactions of the three drivers of nutrient supply [ 7 ], this has been rarely done in relation to different country income groups within the same study.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other examples are 'food mirages', where grocery stores appear abundant but where healthy foods are inaccessible for lower-income consumers due to high food prices (Breyer & Voss-Andreae, 2013;Short, Guthman, & Raskin, 2007;Sullivan, 2014); and 'food swamps', which are areas with disproportionately higher access to energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods (Luan, Law, & Quick, 2015;Rose, Bodor, Hutchinson, & Swalm, 2010). In these kinds of approaches, the problem of poor diets is largely attributed to unhealthy and unsustainable food environments and the solution is therefore sought in structural fixes around improving food environments, for instance through government interventions (Mackenbach, 2021;van Trier et al, 2021).…”
Section: Who Is Responsible?mentioning
confidence: 99%