Hearing in Indian peafowl (Pavo cristatus): sensitivity to infrasound

Abstract

Despite the excitement that followed the report of infrasound sensitivity in pigeons 40 years ago, there has been limited followup, with only eleven species of birds having auditory thresholds at frequencies below 250 Hz. With such sparse data on low-frequency hearing, there is little understanding of why some birds hear very low frequencies while others do not. To begin to expand the phylogenetic and ecological sample of low-frequency hearing in birds, we determined the behavioral audiogram of the Indian peafowl, Pavo cristatus. Peafowl are thought to use low frequencies generated by the males' tail feathers and wing flutters during courtship displays, and their crest feathers are reported to resonate at infrasound frequencies. The peafowl were able to respond to frequencies as low as 4 Hz, and their hearing range at 60 dB SPL extended from 29 Hz to 7.065 kHz (7.9 octaves). Removing the crest feathers reduced sensitivity at their resonant frequencies by as much as 7.5 dB, indicating a modest contribution to detectability in that range. However, perforation of the tympanic membranes severely reduced sensitivity to low frequencies, indicating that sensitivity to low frequencies is mediated primarily by the ears and cannot be attributed to some other sensory modality.

Infrasound as a Cue for Seabird Navigation

“…Despite the vast diversity of birds (>9,000 species), we only know the hearing capabilities of <50 species (Dooling et al, 2000;Gleich and Langemann, 2011). Among bird species whose hearing has been tested, only five species have been measured in the low frequency range using electrophysiological or behavioural approaches, with four out of five species demonstrating hearing ability below 20 Hz, i.e., in the infrasound range (Kreithen and Quine, 1979;Theurich et al, 1984;Hill et al, 2014;Heffner et al, 2020) generally greater than 50 dB relative to 20 µPa sound level pressure (SPL), and increase toward lower frequencies, although this varies across species (see Figure 1 in Zeyl et al, 2020).…”

Behavioral and Evolutionary Perspectives on Visual Lateralization in Mating Birds: A Short Systematic Review

“…In general, the evolution of sexual signals is inseparable from the sensory systems that process the signals in each species (e.g. Lind and Delhey, 2015 ; Hiyama et al, 2018 ; Heffner et al, 2020 ). If visual lateralization has an advantage in recognizing “good” mates, as shown for foraging tasks (Güntürkün et al, 2000 ), those species experiencing intense sexual selection (e.g.…”

Albatross movement suggests sensitivity to infrasound cues at sea

“…There are currently no empirical data on hearing abilities of albatrosses, but most birds hear best below 10 kHz with median best sensitivity at 2 kHz (range 0.99 to 4.03 kHz) and 9.6 dB (range −20 to 21 dB) ( 37 ). While six bird species are directly confirmed to perceive infrasound via audiometric tests, with sensitivity thresholds typically above 50 dB and below 20 Hz ( 38 ), most behavioral tests of infrasonic hearing sensitivity in birds proceed only down to a few Hz ( 11 ). This is likely due to the challenge of producing sounds <1 Hz in open, free-field conditions, which require large sound sources and high amplitudes ( 11 ).…”