1984
DOI: 10.1016/0022-4804(84)90089-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heart-rate effects on canine left-ventricular end-diastolic compliance measured by two-dimensional ultrasound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these, heart rate did not change significantly after CPB; our data indicate minor effects of heart rate variability on diastolic properties. 21 A limited and inconsistent range of EDP for our patients limited comparisons across the group and dictated use of a simple exponential equation for curve-fitting. Our study is also not large enough to identify differences among subgroups (dominant ventricle, specific diagnoses, etc), or to perform multivariate analysis incorporating other potential risk factors for prolonged pleural effusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, heart rate did not change significantly after CPB; our data indicate minor effects of heart rate variability on diastolic properties. 21 A limited and inconsistent range of EDP for our patients limited comparisons across the group and dictated use of a simple exponential equation for curve-fitting. Our study is also not large enough to identify differences among subgroups (dominant ventricle, specific diagnoses, etc), or to perform multivariate analysis incorporating other potential risk factors for prolonged pleural effusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increase in mean HR is still within the physiologic range, as we excluded data at time points when the HR is greater than 100 beats per minute by design. It has been shown that modest increase in HR in animals and humans is only associated with a minor change in LV compliance 22,23 . It is unlikely that the physiologic increase in HR over time in our study would have affected our echocardiographic assessment of LV compliance significantly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Calculations improved with image quality as well as better algorithms for LV end‐diastolic volume (EDV), LVM, and geometry in dogs. Multiple observers blinded to the conditions under which 2‐DE was done validated our calculations [1, 2, 40–48]. LVM measurements proved more accurate and reproducible than measurements of LVEDV despite the fact that LVM is defined by the mathematic difference of calculations of the epicardial and endocardial shells.…”
Section: Myocardial Water Content and LV Massmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…LVM measurements proved more accurate and reproducible than measurements of LVEDV despite the fact that LVM is defined by the mathematic difference of calculations of the epicardial and endocardial shells. The LVM algorithm we developed was also volume‐dependent; LVM increased artifactually with increasing LVEDV [2, 44, 45, 49]. Although the magnitude of this change was relatively small, accuracy was promoted by correcting for differences in LVEDV [49] or by comparing echocardiograms obtained at matched LVEDV [2].…”
Section: Myocardial Water Content and LV Massmentioning
confidence: 99%