2010
DOI: 10.1021/nl101790k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat Conduction across Monolayer and Few-Layer Graphenes

Abstract: We report the thermal conductance G of Au/Ti/graphene/SiO(2) interfaces (graphene layers 1 ≤ n ≤ 10) typical of graphene transistor contacts. We find G ≈ 25 MW m(-2) K(-1) at room temperature, four times smaller than the thermal conductance of a Au/Ti/SiO(2) interface, even when n = 1. We attribute this reduction to the thermal resistance of Au/Ti/graphene and graphene/SiO(2) interfaces acting in series. The temperature dependence of G from 50 ≤ T ≤ 500 K also indicates that heat is predominantly carried by ph… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

44
335
6
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 349 publications
(386 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
44
335
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…15 We thus approximate g RIP  0.02 W m -1 K -1 for heat transfer by RIP scattering in the experiments of Baloch et al 11 To compare these CNT results with our VMTR measurements on graphene interfaces, we 12,13,27 and ~0.004 W m -1 K -1 for the multi-wall CNT interfaces. 15 There are two possible explanations for the different behaviour in graphene and CNTs.…”
Section: Textmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…15 We thus approximate g RIP  0.02 W m -1 K -1 for heat transfer by RIP scattering in the experiments of Baloch et al 11 To compare these CNT results with our VMTR measurements on graphene interfaces, we 12,13,27 and ~0.004 W m -1 K -1 for the multi-wall CNT interfaces. 15 There are two possible explanations for the different behaviour in graphene and CNTs.…”
Section: Textmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We measured the thermal conductance G of SiO 2 /graphene/SiO 2 interfaces by the differential time-domain thermoreflectance (TDTR); details of our approach are described in Ref. 13. We find that G ≈ 41 MW m -2 K -1 , with an uncertainty of ~28%.…”
Section: Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, for suspended samples with the system sizes of several hundreds of microns or less, boundary scattering will significantly limit the thermal conductivity, and the calculated k will increase significantly with increasing system size as demonstrated by the length dependent k shown in Fig. 4(b) 14 corresponding to the case =0,W  . We note that the jump in k at ~4 cm in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This approximation is valid for both the nanoparticles studied (G2N, G3N), because neither the cross-plane conductance nor R B reveals a strong dependence on the thickness of FLG or the nature of the metal substrate [40,41]. Therefore, the thermal resistance of the coating can be expressed by the following equation:…”
Section: Gnp/substrate Interface Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%