2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00526-020-01774-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat flow with Dirichlet boundary conditions via optimal transport and gluing of metric measure spaces

Abstract: We introduce the transportation-annihilation distance W p between subprobabilities and derive contraction estimates with respect to this distance for the heat flow with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions on an open set in a metric measure space. We also deduce the Bochner inequality for the Dirichlet Laplacian as well as gradient estimates for the associated Dirichlet heat flow. For the Dirichlet heat flow, moreover, we establish a gradient flow interpretation within a suitable space of charged probabil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Property (i) instead directly follows from the Boundary volume rigidity Theorems 8. Let now ( X , d, H N ) be the doubling of (X, d, H N ) gluing along ∂ X , see for instance [79] for the precise definition. We claim that it is noncollapsed Ricci limit (of a sequence of smooth N -dimensional Riemannian manifolds with no boundary and Ricci curvature bounded from below by −N ).…”
Section: Topological Regularity Up To the Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Property (i) instead directly follows from the Boundary volume rigidity Theorems 8. Let now ( X , d, H N ) be the doubling of (X, d, H N ) gluing along ∂ X , see for instance [79] for the precise definition. We claim that it is noncollapsed Ricci limit (of a sequence of smooth N -dimensional Riemannian manifolds with no boundary and Ricci curvature bounded from below by −N ).…”
Section: Topological Regularity Up To the Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We extend next the Wasserstein distance to signed measures. We adopt a similar idea to what was suggested in [23,29,15] using a decomposition into positive and negative parts, x (s) = x (s)+ − x (s)− where x (s)+ = max(x (s)+ , 0) and x (s)− = max(−x (s)+ , 0). For any vectors a, b ∈ R p , we define the generalized Wasserstein distance as:…”
Section: Minimum Wassertein Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, as a M/EEG source estimates can be positive or negative, we extend the Wasserstein distance W u to signed measures. We adopt a similar idea to what was suggested in [32,42,53] using a decomposition into positive and negative parts, a = a + − a − where a + = max(a, 0) and a − = max(−a, 0). For any vectors a, b ∈ R p , we define the generalized Wasserstein distance as:…”
Section: Optimal Transport Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%