Systems operating out of equilibrium exchange energy and matter with the environment, thus producing entropy in their surroundings. Since the entropy production depends on the current flowing throughout the system, its quantification is affected by the level of coarse-graining we adopt. In particular, it has been shown that the description of a system via a Fokker-Planck equation (FPE) lead to an underestimation of the entropy production with respect to the corresponding one in terms of microscopic transition rates. Moreover, such a correction can be derived exactly. Here we review this derivation, generalizing it when different prescriptions to derive the FPE from a Langevin equation are adopted. Then, some open problems about Gaussian transition rates and underdamped limit are discussed. In the second part of the manuscript we present a new approach to dealing with the discrepancy in entropy production due to the coarse graining by introducing enough microscopic variables to correctly estimate the entropy production within the FPE description. We show that any discrete state system can be described by making explicit the contribution of each microscopic current.
PACS numbers:A. Entropy Production for coarse-grained dynamics Different levels of description can be adopted to characterize a physical system, depending on the details we are unaware of or deliberately decided to neglect. In particular, when random variables are introduced to encode the uncontrollable degrees of freedom, the energy balance is properly captured by the concepts proper of the stochastic thermodynamics, when the system is small enough [1][2][3]. In this field, a physical system can be described using two different paradigms: Master Equation (ME) and Fokker-Planck equation (FPE) [4][5][6][7]. The former deals with the probability of occupation of each state i at time t, P i (t), and a set of microscopic transition rates between pair of states i and j, W i→j (t). It has the following form:which states the the probability to be in the state i evolves according to the balance between the ingoing and the outgoing probability flux of the state itself. Here we assume that W i→j > 0 implies W j→i > 0, which ensures the ergodicity of the system. Note that here and throughout the manuscript we set W i→i = 0 even though it never enters in the ME above.On the other hand, a Fokker-Planck equation described the system via continuous variables by means of a diffusive dynamics:x (D(x)P (x, t)) (2) where P (x, t) is the probability to be in the state x at the time t, A(x, t) is the drift coefficient and D(x, t) is called the diffusion coefficient. The continuum limit, obtained through a coarse-graining procedure, to derive the latter equation from Eq. (1) is called Kramers-Moyal expansion [4]. It relies on the assumption that the first two "pseudo"-moments [54] of the transition rates are the only ones that are non-negligible, and they are related to A and D respectively.Although the two descriptions appears be equivalent for certain aspects (e.g. equilib...