2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.122100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat transfer and flow visualization of pulsating heat pipe with silica nanofluid: An experimental study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, there was a minimum temperature different was measured for 80% filler ratio at 40W heat input [32][33][34][35]. Similar results were reported elsewhere [36][37][38]. The variation of temperature with different filler ratio of acetone with increase in heat input for all the combinations is shown in Figure 2(a) to Figure 2(f).…”
Section: Temperature Variation For Acetonesupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, there was a minimum temperature different was measured for 80% filler ratio at 40W heat input [32][33][34][35]. Similar results were reported elsewhere [36][37][38]. The variation of temperature with different filler ratio of acetone with increase in heat input for all the combinations is shown in Figure 2(a) to Figure 2(f).…”
Section: Temperature Variation For Acetonesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Heat transfer performance of the OHP with acetone was determined by considering filler ratio of 50% to 80% and heat input of 15W, 20W, 25W, 30W, 35W and 40W was considered. The difference in temperature of evaporator and condenser section temperatures with heat input is studied at steady state condition [26][27][28][29][30]. The obtained results indicated that higher fill ratio of working fluid shows the better results in terms of reduction in difference in temperature, increased heat transfer coefficient across the evaporator and condenser.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another reason to choose closed PHP instead of open PHP is that, with a closed channel, the liquid column and bubbles have a smoother movement and more obvious visualization results [11]. At present, the variable research of closed PHP focuses on the type of working fluids, filling ratio, heat flux power, and inclination angle where it is not necessary to fabricate massive PHPs [12][13][14]. Because the production process of closed PHP is complicated, most of the research can only produce a limited number of PHPs before the experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%