2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat transfer figures of merit for mapping passive regenerator performance to active regenerator cooling power

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 (b). When the utilization is fixed, the effectiveness is generally lower at smaller porosities due to the higher fluid penetration [50]. Although the porosity of the Gd regenerator is higher than for the microchannel regenerator (0.45 to 0.38), the effectiveness in the microchannel regenerator is not significantly lower than in the Gd regenerator.…”
Section: Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…6 (b). When the utilization is fixed, the effectiveness is generally lower at smaller porosities due to the higher fluid penetration [50]. Although the porosity of the Gd regenerator is higher than for the microchannel regenerator (0.45 to 0.38), the effectiveness in the microchannel regenerator is not significantly lower than in the Gd regenerator.…”
Section: Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…By increasing the inclination angle (α) from 15 to 25 at Re = 12,000 with the same diameter ratio (d/b = 0.25), the thermal performance is increased by approximately 17.6 percent. Doubleperforated inclined elliptic (DPIE) ortex generators with d/ b = 0.25 and = 25 achieve the highest thermal performance parameter (η) of 1.849 at Re = 16,000.They have several advantages over active methods, including relative simplicity, lower manufacturing costs, and lower maintenance and repair costs (Gokulnathan, 2021;Wu, 2011;Liang et al, 2020).In passive techniques, increasing flow turbulence is the key to improving heat transfer, while pressure drop or friction factor is typically kept as low as possible. The most commonly used turbulators to improve thermal efficiency are baffles, ribs, winglets, perforated turbulators, louvered strips, inclined elliptical strips, twisted tapes , and different helical inserts, rectangular turbulators (Mahani, 2021), ring inserts, and springs (Kareem, 2015;Liu, 2013).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have many advantages compared to active methods such as their relative simplicity, lower manufacturing costs and lower maintenance and repair costs [1][2][3]. In passive techniques increasing turbulence in the flow is the key aspect of heat transfer improvements, while the pressure drop or friction factor usually retains at a lower possible level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%