1972
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112072002630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat transfer from hypersonic turbulent flow at a wedge compression corner

Abstract: A hypersonic gun tunnel has been used to measure the heat-transfer-rate distribution over a compression corner under turbulent boundary-layer conditions. Attached, incipient and separated flows are considered. The results are compared with other experimental data and with the predictions of a simple theory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…10͑a͒ is due entirely to changes in p 3 . Dissociation in region 3 causes a lower pressure and hence a reduction in L sep , by as much as 50% at H 0 ϱ ϭ1.…”
Section: ͑35͒mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…10͑a͒ is due entirely to changes in p 3 . Dissociation in region 3 causes a lower pressure and hence a reduction in L sep , by as much as 50% at H 0 ϱ ϭ1.…”
Section: ͑35͒mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Assuming that the oil-dot result for the 20 flare case is true, the experimental value of incipient separation is approximately 18 , and the computational value of incipient separation is approximately 13 . This contradicts the findings of Kuehn,8) Coleman 14,16) and Elfstrom 15) who found higher incipient separation angles. This is because the determination of incipient separation is very sensitive to the detection method employed.…”
Section: Turbulent Boundary Layer Studiesmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…This is one of the most significant differences between laminar and turbulent flow. Various researchers 1,8,[14][15][16] have found that very high incipient separation angles (¼ $ 30 ) are possible in hypersonic flow under turbulent conditions. A collection of incipient separation data is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Turbulent Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a further check, and noting the potential influence of the bow shock for blunt ramps (θ > θ D ), the pressure to heat transfer relation from Coleman and Stollery (1972) is evaluated at the stagnation pressure behind a normal shock, P o,N . Defining the ratios with respect to undisturbed flow conditions, P o,R = P o,N /p u and Q max,R = q ′ max /q u , and through Reynolds analogy:…”
Section: Stagnation Heatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noting that heat transfer measurements on SBLIs are relatively limited, a selection of pertinent experimental studies for numerical validation purposes was recently carried out by Marvin et al (2013) under the framework of fundamental hypersonics and reentry work. Different forms of canonical SBLIs included: two-dimensional (2D) ramp interactions at Mach 8.2, 9.2 and 11.3 (Coleman and Stollery 1972;Holden 2014)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%