1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0038-092x(99)00002-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat Transfer Modelling of Screenhouses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, 81.1 and 89.3% reductions in daytime and nighttime air speed, respectively, were observed inside the screenhouse. Our results were similar with the findings of Desmarais, Ratti & Raghavan (1999) who reported an 80% reduction in air speed inside a 3.2 m height screenhouse compared with that in OFC. However, Allen (1975) observed a 67% reduction in air speed in a covered soybean field as compared to an open soybean field.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the present study, 81.1 and 89.3% reductions in daytime and nighttime air speed, respectively, were observed inside the screenhouse. Our results were similar with the findings of Desmarais, Ratti & Raghavan (1999) who reported an 80% reduction in air speed inside a 3.2 m height screenhouse compared with that in OFC. However, Allen (1975) observed a 67% reduction in air speed in a covered soybean field as compared to an open soybean field.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The general mixed linear model used for the prediction of the growing environment, genotype, and interaction factor levels on the total phenotypic response showed that the fructose and glucose contents were significantly lower in the tomatoes grown under the screenhouse (Table ). In our trials, the climatic conditions observed in the screenhouse represented a mean reduction of 26.7% of the average photosynthetically active radiation and an increase of 3.8% of the average day temperature, a common result for these kinds of protection structures . Consequently, the effect of the reduction in the sugar content caused by plant shading , had a higher influence than the increased fruit sink power leading to higher dry matter contents associated with higher temperatures .…”
Section: Results and Discusionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The effects of screens on crop microclimate and water use have been investigated in several studies during the past two decades (Cohen et al, 2005;Desmarais et al, 1999;Kittas et al, 2012;Pirkner et al, 2014;Tanny and Cohen, 2003;Tanny et al, 2003Tanny et al, , 2006Tanny et al, , 2010aTanny et al, ,b, 2014Teitel and Wenger, 2010;Teitel et al, 1996). Screens not only reduce air velocity near the crop but also modify turbulence characteristics (Tanny and Cohen, 2003;Siqueira et al, 2012) and thereby reduce the wind's contribution to heat and water-vapour exchange between plants and atmosphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%