1974
DOI: 10.1007/bf00227909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat transport coefficients for constant energy flux models of broad leaves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4). This type of observation has also been made with respect to heat flux data from the leaves of a terrestrial plant, Phaseolus vulgaris (Wigley and Clark 1974) (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…4). This type of observation has also been made with respect to heat flux data from the leaves of a terrestrial plant, Phaseolus vulgaris (Wigley and Clark 1974) (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Perrier et al (1973) suggested, therefore, that a friction velocity (or some other measure of surface roughness) should be used as a scaling factor in studies on artificial leaves. Wigley & Clark (1974) emphasized the increased heterogeneity in surface temperature distribution for a real vs. an idealized leaf (see Fig. 1 b).…”
Section: Velocity and Humidity Profiles In The Blmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For large leaves like Tectona grandis L.f. or Gmenlina arborea L., which are characterized by high stomatal conductance and high BL resistance, it may become the dominant factor in diffusion pathways (Grace, Fasehun & Dixon, 1980). Like all diffusion processes, the transfer of heat or Grace & Wilson, 1976); (6) Temperature differences observed between surface of artificial and natural leaf, and ambient air (from Wigley & Clark, 1974).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrating for average temperature or heat flux over a rectangle gives a similar relation: Nu = Y Re" Pr"3, 7), Line 2 is from Landsberg and Powell (1973) for the geometry of this tree, and Line 3 is for their isolated leaf; Line 4 is from Monteith (1965); Line 5 is from Scheupp (1972) for clustered leaves; and Line 6 is from Wigley and Clark (1974).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%