1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf02817514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavily accumulated surfaces of mercury cadmium telluride detectors: Theory and experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27 For example, some passivated n-type mercury-cadmium-telluride photoconductive infrared detectors have 2D electron accumulation layers ͑n e ϳ 10 12 cm −2 ͒ at the surfaces, whose SdH peak varies as ͑cos ͒ −1 . 28 However, the angle dependence of SdH signals shown in Fig. 9 is not expressed by ͑cos ͒ −1 dependence.…”
Section: B Anisotropy Of Electron Localizationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…27 For example, some passivated n-type mercury-cadmium-telluride photoconductive infrared detectors have 2D electron accumulation layers ͑n e ϳ 10 12 cm −2 ͒ at the surfaces, whose SdH peak varies as ͑cos ͒ −1 . 28 However, the angle dependence of SdH signals shown in Fig. 9 is not expressed by ͑cos ͒ −1 dependence.…”
Section: B Anisotropy Of Electron Localizationmentioning
confidence: 92%