1978
DOI: 10.1080/00018737800101484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavily doped semiconductors and devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
103
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 309 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 196 publications
4
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large blue shift of the exciton absorption was observed in the UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectrum of (Er, F) co-doped SnO 2 (Figure 6a) and the estimated band gap by the Kubelka-Munk function analysis was 4.18 eV (Figure 6c). The shift could be due to the combined effect of quantum size and the Moss-Burstein effects [43,44]. Additional experiments on the variation of absorption edge with temperature can provide crucial information on thermal activation threshold of this co-doped system as its shape is greatly influenced by the carrier-phonon interaction and the carrier-impurity interactions with increasing temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large blue shift of the exciton absorption was observed in the UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectrum of (Er, F) co-doped SnO 2 (Figure 6a) and the estimated band gap by the Kubelka-Munk function analysis was 4.18 eV (Figure 6c). The shift could be due to the combined effect of quantum size and the Moss-Burstein effects [43,44]. Additional experiments on the variation of absorption edge with temperature can provide crucial information on thermal activation threshold of this co-doped system as its shape is greatly influenced by the carrier-phonon interaction and the carrier-impurity interactions with increasing temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It only depends weakly on n el even though both E 1 and E 2 vary with n el noticeably. This variation arises mainly from the mutual exchange and Coulomb interactions between the electrons which show up as an effective increase in the energy of the defects [29,30]. The Coulomb interactions among the electrons themselves lead to the lowering of the energy of the conduction band by approximately [29],…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantities of interest are the bandgap E g is reduced by 800 meV, while E 11 B is reduced by 590 meV. Both of these changes are large by any measure; in particular we estimate that band gap renormalization (BGR) is about an order of magnitude larger than in typical bulk semiconductors at the same doping [14]. The QP bands and exciton level associated with the second lowest prominent optical transition (E 22 , not shown in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%