2021
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac09f7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy Magnetic Neutron Stars

Abstract: We systematically study the properties of pure nucleonic and hyperonic magnetic stars using a density-dependent relativistic mean-field (DD-RMF) equations of state. We explore several parameter sets and hyperon coupling schemes within the DD-RMF formalism. We focus on sets that are in better agreement with nuclear and other astrophysical data while generating heavy neutron stars. Magnetic field effects are included in the matter equation of state and in general relativity solutions, which in addition fulfill M… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 160 publications
1
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the effect of the strong MF, we find that not always the magnetar models have a higher maximum mass than the low MF models, unlike other works (Rabhi et al 2009;Mariani et al 2019;Thapa et al 2020;Rather et al 2021); in our model, Sets 1 and 2 show slightly higher maximum masses for magnetars, but for Set 3 3 for details).…”
Section: Results For Stellar Structure and Stabilitycontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Regarding the effect of the strong MF, we find that not always the magnetar models have a higher maximum mass than the low MF models, unlike other works (Rabhi et al 2009;Mariani et al 2019;Thapa et al 2020;Rather et al 2021); in our model, Sets 1 and 2 show slightly higher maximum masses for magnetars, but for Set 3 3 for details).…”
Section: Results For Stellar Structure and Stabilitycontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…In this sense, the observation of NSs of a mass higher than 2 M , the most massive NS observed to date, with a mass of ∼2.28 M (Kandel & Romani 2020) or a 2.08 M NS (Fonseca et al 2021), rejected the validity of many proposed EoS; furthermore the first observation of gravitational waves (GWs) emitted by a binary NS merger (Abbott et al 2017) set additional limits on their stiffness (Abbott et al 2018;Bauswein 2019). Moreover, if the low-mass component of the recent binary coalescence event GW190814 (Abbott et al 2020a) is interpreted as a NS, it would set extremely stringent limits on the maximum mass that a valid EoS must be able to reach (Kanakis-Pegios et al 2021;Godzieba et al 2021;Lim et al 2021;Rather et al 2021;Bombaci et al 2021). On the other hand, the recent results of the NICER telescope (Pang et al 2021;Zhang & Li 2021) allowed tighter limits to be set on the possible EoS of NSs by constraining their radius.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approximation is taken for the simplicity of the calculations. It can be considered equivalent to the density/chemical potential dependent magnetic field profiles where the central field is quite low [95,114]. In such circumstances, the EoS does not deviate much from the field-free case, and the magnetic field almost becomes constant for most parts of NS [95,114].…”
Section: Unified Eos and Neutron Star Observablesmentioning
confidence: 99%