2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy metals uptake by sonicated activated sludge: Relation with floc surface properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, Stanley AS and Shatin AS had RH values of 67 and 82 %, respectively, indicating the presence of both hydrophobic and hydrophilic groups at the sludge surface, and Shatin AS was slightly more hydrophobic than Stanley AS. Similar hydrophobicity results for AS (50-85 %) were reported by Jin et al (2003) and Laurent et al (2009).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Assupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, Stanley AS and Shatin AS had RH values of 67 and 82 %, respectively, indicating the presence of both hydrophobic and hydrophilic groups at the sludge surface, and Shatin AS was slightly more hydrophobic than Stanley AS. Similar hydrophobicity results for AS (50-85 %) were reported by Jin et al (2003) and Laurent et al (2009).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Assupporting
confidence: 85%
“…where S is the specific surface area of the AS (in square meters per gram), q max is the monolayer saturation adsorption capacity (in moles per gram) obtained from the Langmuir model fitting, N is Avogadro's number (6.023× 10 23 molecules mol −1 ), and A is the area occupied by a single rhodamine B molecule (1.95×10 −18 m 2 molecule −1 ) (Laurent et al 2009). …”
Section: Specific Surface Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only when the pH was 3, the effect of ultrasonic treatment on the materials was minimal, and for the coal fly ash, the sorption uptake was slightly higher for the treated material. The Zn uptake enhancement was assigned to modifications in the morphology and size particle distribution of the clays and fly ash after being treated by an ultrasound process making it more ready for the sorption process of heavy metals, as it has been demonstrated by others [25][26] .…”
Section: Effect Of Ultrasonic Activation Of Sorbent Materialsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…-For the weakest ozone doses (until 8.1 mg O 3 /g TS), the observed Q max increase could be due to the generation of fine particles (see Section 3.1), leading to a larger specific surface area which provided more active sites for cadmium binding to sludge particles. Similarly, the increase of specific surface area after ultrasonic disintegration was previously shown to increase cadmium sorption capacity of activated sludge [37]. At the same time, the increase of soluble phosphate concentration could have favored cadmium precipitation (see Section 3.1).…”
Section: Cadmium Uptake By Ozonized Sludgementioning
confidence: 80%