2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1811043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy-Tailed Distributions: Data, Diagnostics, and New Developments

Abstract: This monograph is written for the numerate nonspecialist, and hopes to serve three purposes. First it gathers mathematical material from diverse but related fields of order statistics, records, extreme value theory, majorization, regular variation and subexponentiality. All of these are relevant for understanding fat tails, but they are not, to our knowledge, brought together in a single source for the target readership. Proofs that give insight are included, but for fussy calculations the reader is referred t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 The extent to which the tails of the distribution have become heavier over time is also investigated. We calculate two indexes of tail heaviness commonly used in the literature (Table 1): the first is the percentage of observations that stay out of the interval "mean  double standard deviation", while the second is the Obesity Index proposed by Cooke et al (2014). 7 The latter is computed as ( ) = ( 1 + 4 > 2 + 3 | 1 ≤ 2 ≤ 3 ≤ 4 ), and is based on the heuristic that, in the case of heavy-tailed distributions, larger observations lie further apart than smaller observations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 The extent to which the tails of the distribution have become heavier over time is also investigated. We calculate two indexes of tail heaviness commonly used in the literature (Table 1): the first is the percentage of observations that stay out of the interval "mean  double standard deviation", while the second is the Obesity Index proposed by Cooke et al (2014). 7 The latter is computed as ( ) = ( 1 + 4 > 2 + 3 | 1 ≤ 2 ≤ 3 ≤ 4 ), and is based on the heuristic that, in the case of heavy-tailed distributions, larger observations lie further apart than smaller observations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet the likelihood of extreme events diminishes slightly over the period analyzed. A further method to look for fat tails in a distribution is to compare the plot of the mean excess function (MEF) of the data with the MEF plot obtained through aggregation of the original data set by m (as suggested by Cooke et al 2014). The mean excess function of a random variable X gives the expected excess of the random variable over a certain threshold u, given that the random variable is larger than the threshold.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of applying this distribution to describe a parameter in a model of fatigue crack growth can be found in Doliński [12]. Log-normal distribution applications associated with the problems of the reliability theory are offered in the works [23,10,28,33], and for the extreme value theory applied to warning forecasts in hydrology they are found in the work [26]. Basic characteristics of the LN distribution are provided in Table 1 [29].T …”
Section: Log-normal Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alongside some ordinary descriptive statistics (i.e. kurtosis and skewness), we compute the percentage of observations that stay out of the interval "mean±double standard deviation" and the Obesity Index -ObIn (Cooke & Nieboer, 2011). 14 The latter is based on the heuristic that, in the case of heavy-tailed distributions, larger observations lie further apart than smaller observations, and it is computed as follows:…”
Section: Climate-origin Shocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The skewness is positive and small, indicating rather symmetric distributions, with a slightly longer right tail. The kurtosis is larger than the reference value for a normal distribution (3) A further method to look for fat tails in a distribution is to compare the mean excess plot of the data sample with the mean excess plot of a data set obtained through aggregating the original data set by k, as suggested by Cooke & Nieboer (2011). The mean excess function -MEF -of a random variable X gives the expected excess of the random variable over a certain threshold u, given that the random variable is larger than the threshold.…”
Section: Climate-origin Shocksmentioning
confidence: 99%