2018
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy-tailed prior distributions for sequence count data: removing the noise and preserving large differences

Abstract: Motivation In RNA-seq differential expression analysis, investigators aim to detect those genes with changes in expression level across conditions, despite technical and biological variability in the observations. A common task is to accurately estimate the effect size, often in terms of a logarithmic fold change (LFC). Results When the read counts are low or highly variable, the maximum likelihood estimates for the LFCs has high variance, leading to large estimates not… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
825
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,406 publications
(826 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
825
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Differential expression analyses were performed using the R package DESeq2 v1.20 (Love et al, 2014) using default parameters. Log2FoldChanges and adjusted p-values were corrected using the apeglm (Zhu et al, 2019) and IHW (Ignatiadis et al, 2016) packages, respectively. Genes with an absolute log2 fold change of 1.5 and FDR < 0.05 were considered as differentially expressed (Table S2).…”
Section: Rna-seq Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differential expression analyses were performed using the R package DESeq2 v1.20 (Love et al, 2014) using default parameters. Log2FoldChanges and adjusted p-values were corrected using the apeglm (Zhu et al, 2019) and IHW (Ignatiadis et al, 2016) packages, respectively. Genes with an absolute log2 fold change of 1.5 and FDR < 0.05 were considered as differentially expressed (Table S2).…”
Section: Rna-seq Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DESeq2 analysis modelled fold change between time points using the cell line as an independent factor (using the model '~cell_line + condition'), and fold changes were calculated using lfcShrink function, applying the apeglm method (v 1.2.1) (Zhu et al, 2018). Gene ontology enrichment analysis was performed using clusterProfiler R package (Yu et al, 2012).…”
Section: Rna-seq Sample Preparation and Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. RNA from 15,000 to 200,000 FrB cells was et al, 2014) by extracting differences between different genotypes in pair-wise comparisons using "apeglm" method as a shrinkage estimator (Zhu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Mrnaseq Libraries From Frb Pro-b Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Read counts mapped over genes were counted with HTSeq (v0.10.0) (Anders et al, 2015) with f bam -r names no -a 10 parameters and the Mus_musculus.GRCm38.93.gtf annotation from Ensembl.Reads mapping to immunoglobulin genes (including V, D, J gene segments, light and heavy immunoglobulin genes and T cell receptor genes) were excluded before DESeq2 analysis. Differences in mRNA abundance were computed with DESeq2 (v1.22.1)(Love et al, 2014) by extracting differences between different genotypes in pair-wise comparisons using "apeglm" method as a shrinkage estimator(Zhu et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%