2011
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1110.0914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy-Traffic Analysis of a Multiple-Phase Network with Discriminatory Processor Sharing

Abstract: We analyze a generalization of the discriminatory processor-sharing (DPS) queue in a heavy-traffic setting. Customers present in the system are served simultaneously at rates controlled by a vector of weights. We assume that customers have phase-type distributed service requirements and allow that customers have different weights in various phases of their service. In our main result we establish a state-space collapse for the queue-length vector in heavy traffic. The result shows that in the limit, the queue… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first term of the numerator is in accordance with the results of [30] and [33], the second term is a result of the random environment. The results in Sections 5 and 6.1 are based on the assumption that lim N →∞ 1 N M · 1 {Z=d} exists.…”
Section: Distribution Of the Common Factorsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first term of the numerator is in accordance with the results of [30] and [33], the second term is a result of the random environment. The results in Sections 5 and 6.1 are based on the assumption that lim N →∞ 1 N M · 1 {Z=d} exists.…”
Section: Distribution Of the Common Factorsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Proof. We follow closely the steps of the proof of Lemma 3 in [33]. The proof has 3 steps: (i) Show that F k,∞ (s) is parallel to the hyperplane.…”
Section: State-space Collapsementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, Proposition 2.1 gives a proof of the state space collapse stated in [10,Theorem 5]. It also implies several other interesting new results for the standard DPS queue, which we briefly mention here, referring to [15,Chapter 2] and [16] for full details. For example, we can show that the (scaled) numbers of customers in the various classes and the remaining service requirements of any finite subset of customers are independent in a heavy-traffic setting.…”
Section: The Standard Dps Queuementioning
confidence: 63%
“…Equation (2) turns out to be very useful to analyze the joint queue length distribution in heavy traffic, because it allows for an explicit solution in that asymptotic regime as we will indicate next. We refer to [15,Chapter 2] and [16] for full details. We writes = (s 1 , .…”
Section: Sketch Of the Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%