Hegel, the Trinity, and the ‘I’

Bubbio, Paolo Diego

doi:10.1007/s11153-014-9451-8

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As with Hölderlin, a judgement ( Urteil ) involves an original separation ( Ur-Teilung ) within a unity, but not the unity of ‘being’ but rather of der Begriff itself. This means that a judgement is not to be thought of as the application of a concept-representation to some given existent: a judgement will be thought of as a relation between two determinations of the concept, the three determinations of conceptuality being universality, particularity, and singularity (analogous to the structure of the Trinity (Bubbio (2014b) ). Aristotle in his syllogistic had only allowed the quantities of universality and particularity, while singular judgements had come to be added in the Middle Ages, raising the question of exactly how to incorporate them, the favoured solution being to class them with universal judgements 15 .…”

Section: Concept Judgement and Inference In Hegel's Logicmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hegel and the ontological argument for the existence of God

Redding

Bubbio

2014

Rel. Stud.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We reconstruct Hegel's implicit version of the ontological argument in the light of his anti-representationalist idealist metaphysics. For Hegel, the ontological argument had been a peculiarly modern form of argument for the existence of God, presupposing a ‘representationalist’ account of the mind and its concepts. As such, it was susceptible to Kant's famous refutation, but Kant himself had provided a model for an alternative conception of concept, one developed by Fichte with his notion of the I=I. We reconstruct an Hegelian version of the ontological argument by considering the possibility of a Fichtean version, and then subjecting it to a critique based on Hegel's critical appropriation of Fichte's I=I.

show abstract

Section: Concept Judgement and Inference In Hegel's Logicmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hegel and the ontological argument for the existence of God

Redding

Bubbio

2014

Rel. Stud.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Hegel: Death of God and Recognition of the Self

Bubbio

2015

International Journal of Philosophical Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hegel’s Account of Christianity and Religious Alienation

Stewart

2021

EJPR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In his Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion, Hegel argues that the development of the religions of the world leads up to and culminates in Christianity, which is the one true religion. One key element which separates Christianity from the other religions, according to Hegel, concerns the issue of alienation. He argues that the previous religions all contain some form of alienation, which can be found in their conceptions of the divine. In this paper, I wish to examine Hegel’s view that Christianity alone overcomes religious alienation. What is it that makes Christianity so special in this regard? This is a particularly important issue given that the question of alienation is so central in the post-Hegelian thinkers such as Feuerbach, Bauer, and Marx, who all insist that, far from overcoming alienation, Christianity is guilty of causing it. I wish to argue that this issue provides new insight into the old criticism of Hegel as a thinker of abstraction.

show abstract

Hegel, the Trinity, and the ‘I’

Cited by 3 publications

References 15 publications

Hegel and the ontological argument for the existence of God

Hegel and the ontological argument for the existence of God

Hegel: Death of God and Recognition of the Self

Hegel’s Account of Christianity and Religious Alienation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About