1979
DOI: 10.1086/157489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Helium abundance anomalies and radiative forces in stellar envelopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed abundance peculiarities can in principle be explained within the framework of atomic diffusion (Michaud et al 1979). Diffusion theory predicts that the photospheres of all HgMn stars should be deficient in helium, which was confirmed for instance in a dedicated study by Dworetsky (2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The observed abundance peculiarities can in principle be explained within the framework of atomic diffusion (Michaud et al 1979). Diffusion theory predicts that the photospheres of all HgMn stars should be deficient in helium, which was confirmed for instance in a dedicated study by Dworetsky (2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Among these stars, He-strong and He-weak stars present sometimes signs of magnetically controlled winds (Brown et al 1985;Shore & Brown 1990) which have been interpreted as the signature of mass loss near one magnetic pole. For Herich stars, a stellar wind has also been invoked by Vauclair (1975) to account for their observed helium enrichment (by a factor 2 or 3): this enrichment cannot be explained by diffusion alone as the upward radiative acceleration on helium is always smaller that the gravity (Montmerle & Michaud 1976;Michaud et al 1979). Vauclair (1975) showed that an overall macroscopic mass loss flux could advect helium up to the observed layers.…”
Section: Mass Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of helium the radiative acceleration is always negligible because the helium cosmic abundance is very high. Moreover, in the considered stars, the thermal diffusion is also usually negligible (Michaud et al 1979). Taking into account the electrical field induced by ionelectron separation, the gravitational settling term can be written:…”
Section: Microscopic Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since underabundances of Ca and Sc are essential observational characteristics of most Am stars, the disappearance of the He II convection zone is essential if Am stars are to be explained by this diffusion model. As the results of Michaud et al (1976) show, most of the elements for which g R > g below the H convection zone are observed to be overabundant and those for which g R < g are underabundant.…”
Section: Upper Main Sequence and Am Starsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This is the simplest assumption but may not be justified. Michaud et al (1987) evaluated that there could be separation in the wind (i. e. above the photosphere) for mass loss rates as high as 10" 12 M 0 yr" 1 but this rested on approximations for the wind model that maximize the separation for a given mass loss rate. They concluded that the separation was more likely to occur in the photosphere than above.…”
Section: A and F Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%