2006
DOI: 10.2478/s11687-006-0006-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Helminth fauna of sympatric Przewalski’s Equus przewalskii Poljakov, 1881 and domestic horses E. caballus L. in the Chernobyl exclusion zone, Ukraine

Abstract: SummaryIn 1998 Przewalski's horses have been introduced in the Chernobyl exclusion zone (CEZ), N Ukraine. They live in the zone under natural conditions. No anthelminthic treatment to these introduced horses has been applied to date. In this same area, 19 domestic horses were also stabled by some peasants. Eighteen years after the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, and five years after this introduction, the diagnostic dehelminthisation method has been applied both to the Przewalski's horses (n = 21) and the domestic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to point out that two cyathostome species, Cyathostomum montgomeryi and Cylicostephanus bidentatus were recorded for the first time in the wild and brood horses (E. caballus) in Poland. The present results are similar to those obtained in the earlier study of Przewalski horses under natural conditions in the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone (CEZ), Ukraine (Slivinska et al, 2006). Characteristics of area and climatic conditions for Przewalski horse and Polish primitive horse are (Gawor, 2000), which is similar to the present results, but on the contrary to our data C. nassatus in the previous investigations was much less plentiful (4.8 %).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to point out that two cyathostome species, Cyathostomum montgomeryi and Cylicostephanus bidentatus were recorded for the first time in the wild and brood horses (E. caballus) in Poland. The present results are similar to those obtained in the earlier study of Przewalski horses under natural conditions in the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone (CEZ), Ukraine (Slivinska et al, 2006). Characteristics of area and climatic conditions for Przewalski horse and Polish primitive horse are (Gawor, 2000), which is similar to the present results, but on the contrary to our data C. nassatus in the previous investigations was much less plentiful (4.8 %).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Hence, there are no data on gastro-intestinal parasites of the wild Polish primitive horses from the reserve. In this study, gastro-intestinal parasites of wild yearlings captured in the Reserve were collected using the technique of diagnostic deworming (Kuzmina et al, 2005 (Slivinska et al, 2006) is the basis for ecological management of the parasitological situation in free-living horses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, such indices may provide information about future welfare risks, and thus become important welfare alerting indices. Some other animal-based indices, such as faecal egg counts (FECs), may also only provide welfare alerting rather than welfare status information (Figure 5b, Table 2), because, when FEC is high, free-roaming horses frequently do not exhibit overt clinical signs of disease [118,119]. Hence, interpreted in isolation they do not necessarily indicate presence of intestinal pathology and any related negative experience.…”
Section: Some Animal-based Indices Provide Welfare Alerting Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of studies on gastrointestinal parasites of wild horses is insufficient worldwide. Many helminths, especially S. vulgaris, have been detected in the studies performed [16,25,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. The presence of strongyle eggs and some other helminth infections in wild horses has been reported in the USA [29,35], Canada [34], Australia [25], Venezuela [32], Ukraine [30], and Poland [31,33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%