2003
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1822518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Helping Outstanding Pupils Educationally: Public Policy Issues of the Georgia HOPE Scholarship Program and the Lottery for Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most commonly cited rationale has been the need to develop and retain highly qualified workers in a state (Heller & Marin, 2004;Rogers & Heller, 2003). Other policymakers have argued that merit aid programs are a way to create incentives for higher student performance (Heller & Marin, 2002;Rubinstein, 2003). Other policymakers have argued that merit aid programs are a way to create incentives for higher student performance (Heller & Marin, 2002;Rubinstein, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly cited rationale has been the need to develop and retain highly qualified workers in a state (Heller & Marin, 2004;Rogers & Heller, 2003). Other policymakers have argued that merit aid programs are a way to create incentives for higher student performance (Heller & Marin, 2002;Rubinstein, 2003). Other policymakers have argued that merit aid programs are a way to create incentives for higher student performance (Heller & Marin, 2002;Rubinstein, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policymaker support for merit-based aid stems from a range of policy goals. Among these goals are keeping the best and brightest students at home to address issues related to state economic competitiveness and development Doyle 2006;Heller and Rogers 2003), increasing access to college for various student groups Dynarski 2000;Heller and Marin 2002), promoting and rewarding academic excellence Heller and Marin 2002;Rubinstein 2003), responding to accountability issues with tangible measures such as academic benchmarks (Dynarski 2003), placating middle-income voters (Dynarski 2000), and mirroring others' merit-based programs (McLendon and Heller 2002). Georgia's HOPE scholarship program, which was adopted in 1993, is often viewed as the prototypical state merit-based student scholarship program Marin 2002, 2004).…”
Section: Merit Broad-based Scholarships and Student Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%