2014
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemispheric asymmetries in word recognition as revealed by the orthographic uniqueness point effect

Abstract: The orthographic uniqueness point (OUP) refers to the first letter of a word that, reading from left to right, makes the word unique. It has recently been proposed that OUPs might be relevant in word recognition and their influence could inform the long-lasting debate of whether – and to what extent – printed words are recognized serially or in parallel. The present study represents the first investigation of the neural and behavioral effects of OUP on visual word recognition. Behaviourally, late OUP words wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8). These results are consistent with those of Izura et al (2014), Miller et al (2006), and Radeau et al (1992). The same OUP effect was obtained in the auditory modality.…”
Section: Rtssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…8). These results are consistent with those of Izura et al (2014), Miller et al (2006), and Radeau et al (1992). The same OUP effect was obtained in the auditory modality.…”
Section: Rtssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…OUP were processed more slowly than words with a late OUP (Izura, Wright, & Fouquet, 2014;Miller, Juhasz, & Rayner, 2006;Radeau, Morais, Mousty, Saerens, & Bertelson, 1992), suggesting that word processing is likely to occur in a parallel manner. Here, we found that words with an early OUP were processed more slowly than words with a late OUP in the visual modality (see Fig.…”
Section: Rtsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With more than 5500 article views and an AM score of more than 50 by the time this editorial was written, this article has gained more online attention than almost any other work published in Frontiers in Cognition. Other authors investigated visual lateralization (Asanowicz et al, 2013 ; Pellicano et al, 2013 ; Helon and Króliczak, 2014 ), asymmetries in emotional processing (Propper and Brunyé, 2013 ; Grimshaw and Carmel, 2014 ), behavioral lateralization (Morton, 2013 ; Corbetta et al, 2014 ), and asymmetries in face (Coronel and Federmeier, 2014 ) and body representation (Hach and Schütz-Bosbach, 2014 ), as well as in word generation (Meyer et al, 2014 ) and word recognition (Izura et al, 2014 ). Finally, some authors also investigated the impact of lateralized processing on executive functioning, the topic which had initially inspired this Research Topic (Marsh et al, 2013 ; Ocklenburg et al, 2013a ; Kéïta et al, 2014 ; Stock and Beste, 2014 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With more than 5500 article views and an AM score of more than 50 by the time this editorial was written, this article has gained more online attention than almost any other work published in Frontiers in Cognition. Other authors investigated visual lateralization (Asanowicz et al, 2013;Pellicano et al, 2013;Helon and Króliczak, 2014), asymmetries in emotional processing (Propper and Brunyé, 2013;Grimshaw and Carmel, 2014), behavioral lateralization (Morton, 2013;Corbetta et al, 2014), and asymmetries in face (Coronel and Federmeier, 2014) and body representation (Hach and Schütz-Bosbach, 2014), as well as in word generation (Meyer et al, 2014) and word recognition (Izura et al, 2014). Finally, some authors also investigated the impact of lateralized processing on executive functioning, the topic which had initially inspired this Research Topic (Marsh et al, 2013;Ocklenburg et al, 2013a;Kéïta et al, 2014;Stock and Beste, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%