1982
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(82)90367-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hemodynamic and hormonal responses during captopril therapy for heart failure: Acute, chronic and withdrawal studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
8
0
2

Year Published

1982
1982
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1980a;Nicholls et al 1982). The present data are confirmatory since angiotensin I1 correlated closely with concomitant aldosterone levels in our patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…1980a;Nicholls et al 1982). The present data are confirmatory since angiotensin I1 correlated closely with concomitant aldosterone levels in our patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our results are compatible with those re ported by others [11][12][13][14]. The observed de crease in systemic venous and PCW pres sures are more difficult to explain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The decrease in heart rate from 83.4 to 70.8 bpm observed by us and others, is most likely due to reflex sympathetic withdrawal follow ing captopril [11], All patients experienced very impressive subjective improvement, associated with documented improvement in the hemody namic parameters. It has been postulated that endogenous opiates and endorphines take part in the mechanisms causing this sub jective improvement [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a reduction of systemic resistance and an increase in cardiac output, stroke volume, and stroke work index. In left ventricular failure decreasing systemic vascular resistance to improve cardiac performance is the basis for the use of vasodilator therapy (Chatterjee & Parmley, 1977 Nicholls et al (1982) we found that on withdrawal of captopril there was little rebound haemodynamic deterioration or worsening of left ventricular function. During treatment neither anginal attacks not extension of myocardial ischaemia occurred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%