1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf02016745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatorenal and Splenorenal Artery Bypass for Salvage of Renal Function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eight patients with ARAS and azotemia were treated with six hepatorenal and five splenorenal artery bypasses. SCr improved in all patients but only four of the five patients with severe hypertension had improved BP outcomes 14. Splenorenal bypass is associated with a high risk of splenic and pancreatic injury while trying to expose the splenic artery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Eight patients with ARAS and azotemia were treated with six hepatorenal and five splenorenal artery bypasses. SCr improved in all patients but only four of the five patients with severe hypertension had improved BP outcomes 14. Splenorenal bypass is associated with a high risk of splenic and pancreatic injury while trying to expose the splenic artery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…If the celiac artery is not patent, hepatorenal bypass and splenorenal bypass are not suitable as they can lead to infarction of the liver and spleen, respectively [2]. Furthermore, hepatorenal bypass is contraindicated when the patient has liver dysfunction, and splenorenal bypass requires a great exposure and is associated with a risk of splenic and pancreatic injuries [4]. Both ileorenal bypass and kidney AutoTx are not suitable when severe iliac arterial atherosclerosis is present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although PTRA is less invasive, in-stent restenosis remains a frequently encountered problem, reaching 20% at 1 year after PTRA [3]. Open hepatosplenorenal bypass can contribute to long-term bypass patency; however, it is invasive and can cause liver and spleen injury or infarction [4]. In contrast, the usefulness and safety of kidney autotransplantation (AutoTx) as a treatment for renal artery stenosis after PTRA have only been rarely reported [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 This traditionally and most often was employed to treat renovascular hypertension secondary to renal artery stenosis. [1][2][3] It also was employed, after both blunt and penetrating trauma to the abdomen, as a salvage procedure to preserve renal function. Other reported applications included treatment of bilateral renal artery injury if only one kidney was present, repair of a solitary arterial injury by simple lateral arteriorrhaphy, 4 and correction of a renal artery rupture during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Splenorenal arterial bypass may be an advantageous alternative for renal revascularization, particularly, in patients with an aorta that precludes an aortorenal bypass. 2 Such patients include those whose cardiac dysfunction might be exacerbated by aortic clamping, those who have undergone previous aortic graft placement, 3 and those with severely atherosclerotic aortic walls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%