Weed Research 2017
DOI: 10.1002/9781119380702.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Herbicide Resistance in Weeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total or partial glyphosate resistance/tolerance may be due to alterations in the target‐site represented by single or double mutations in the conserved region of the EPSPS gene, EPSPS gene duplication or both . Reduced uptake and/or impaired translocation and degradation of glyphosate into non‐toxic substances as well as hypersensitive reactions have also been reported as non‐target site resistance mechanisms contributing to the resistance to this herbicide …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Total or partial glyphosate resistance/tolerance may be due to alterations in the target‐site represented by single or double mutations in the conserved region of the EPSPS gene, EPSPS gene duplication or both . Reduced uptake and/or impaired translocation and degradation of glyphosate into non‐toxic substances as well as hypersensitive reactions have also been reported as non‐target site resistance mechanisms contributing to the resistance to this herbicide …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,23 Reduced uptake and/or impaired translocation and degradation of glyphosate into non-toxic substances as well as hypersensitive reactions have also been reported as non-target site resistance mechanisms contributing to the resistance to this herbicide. [24][25][26] Chloris barbata individuals survived the widely used standard dose of 720 g acid equivalent (ae) ha −1 of glyphosate in citrus-production systems from Colima. Loss of susceptibility to glyphosate in C. barbata may be due to an increase in its innate tolerance or the evolution of resistance mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1995, 324,000 ha of arable land were treated with glyphosate, but by 2016 this had increased to 2,665,000 ha (Garthwaite et al 2018). This increase in glyphosate use is due to several factors, including the loss of paraquat, which was banned in the European Union in 2007 (Chauvel et al 2012; Clark 2012), increasing herbicide resistance to other modes of action in the United Kingdom (Hicks et al 2018; Moss 2017b; Moss et al 2011), and a reduction in the cost of glyphosate since 1993 (Woodburn 2000). Together, these factors have led to greater glyphosate usage and, consequently, have increased the risk of glyphosate resistance in the United Kingdom, particularly in weeds that are becoming more prevalent in arable farming situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic factors such as genetic variability (mutations localized in a single locus), heredity patterns (dominance of genes enable rapid dispersion), type of pollination (cross-pollination allows for greater genetic recombination and recessive alleles are more easily established in autogenous species), flow gene (transfer resistance characteristics to a susceptible population) and number of resistance genes involved; and bioecological factors such as short life cycle, high seed yield, low dormancy, multiple generations per year, mechanism of propagule dispersion, extreme susceptibility to herbicides, population size, and low biodiversity are key factors in the selection of herbicide resistant weed populations [65]. However, in this section only the agronomic, economic, and even scientific-technical factors that may have contributed to the increase in herbicide resistance in Brazil will be discussed.…”
Section: Herbicide Resistance: the Problem And The Causementioning
confidence: 99%