Heritability of Psychotic Experiences in Adolescents and Interaction With Environmental Risk

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Genetic risk factors are known to play a role in the etiology of psychotic experiences in the general population. Little is known about whether these risk factors interact with environmental risks for psychotic experiences.OBJECTIVE To assess etiological heterogeneity and exposure to environmental risks associated with psychotic experiences in adolescence using the twin design. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThis twin study, conducted from December 1, 2014, to August 31, 2020, included a UK-based sample of twin pairs aged 16 years. This investigation evaluated the extent to which the genetic variance underlying psychotic experiences and the magnitude of the heritability of psychotic experiences was moderated by exposure to 5 environmental risk factors (bullying, dependent life events, cannabis use, tobacco use, and low birth weight). Psychotic experiences were assessed by 5 self-reported measures and 1 parent-reported measure. Participants' exposure to environmental risks was assessed at birth and age 12 to 16 years. Structural equation models were used to assess differences in the variance in and heritability of psychotic experiences across these exposures, while controlling for gene-environment correlation effects. Analyses were repeated in an independent Swedish sample. Data analyses were performed from September 1, 2018, to August 31, 2020.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcome measures were exposure to environmental factors, as measured by a composite score, and psychotic experiences.RESULTS A total of 4855 twin pairs (1926 female same-sex pairs, 1397 male same-sex pairs, and 1532 opposite-sex pairs) were included from the Twins Early Development Study (TEDS), and 6435 twin pairs (2358 female same-sex pairs, 1861 male same-sex pairs, and 2216 opposite-sex pairs) were included from the Child and Adolescent Twin Study in Sweden (CATSS). Mean age of twins from TEDS was 16.5 years. Mean age of twins from CATSS was 18.6 years. More exposure to environmental risk factors was associated with having more psychotic experiences. The relative contribution of genetic influences to psychotic experiences was lower with increasing environmental exposure for paranoia (44%; 95% CI, 33%-53% to 38%; 95% CI, 14%-58%), cognitive disorganization (47%; 95% CI, 38%-51% to 32%; 95% CI, 11%-45%), grandiosity (41%; 95% CI, 29%-52% to 32%; 95% CI, 9%-48%), and anhedonia (49%; 95% CI, 42%-53% to 37%; 95% CI, 15%-54%). This pattern was replicated for the measure of psychotic experiences in the independent Swedish replication sample. The heritability of hallucinations and parent-rated negative symptoms remained relatively constant.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Findings of this twin study suggest that environmental factors play a greater role in the etiology of psychotic experiences than genetic factors. The relative importance of environmental factors is even higher among individuals exposed to environmental risks for psychotic experiences, highlighting the importance of a diathesis-stress or bioecological framework for under...

Increased blood neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) associated with early life stress: translational findings in recent-onset schizophrenia and rodent model

“…A history of childhood maltreatment identifies subgroups of patients with higher NETs and IL-6 levels Schizophrenia pathophysiology is likely the result of complex biological-environment associations [83][84][85]. Having identified higher NETs in patients compared to controls, our next step was to test potential environmental triggers associated with the immunological profile.…”

Functional neuroimaging in psychiatry and the case for failing better

“…Yet, first-line pharmacotherapies still rely on putative molecular mechanisms of action that derive from serendipitous observations dating back to the 1950s (Braslow and Marder, 2019), and, despite some progress in development of novel therapies (Brannan et al, 2021;Brunoni et al, 2017;Carhart-Harris et al, 2021;Daly et al, 2019;Davis et al, 2021;Koblan et al, 2020;McClure-Begley and Roth, 2022;Mitchell et al, 2021;Popova et al, 2019), both pharmacological and psychological interventions remain ineffective for many patients (Malhi and Mann, 2018;McCutcheon et al, 2020;Simmonds-Buckley et al, 2021). It might be argued that this attests to the unique complexity of psychiatric disorders, where causal pathways are assumed to reflect an interplay of psychological, environmental, socio-cultural, genetic, and other biological factors (Singh et al, 2022;Sterling and Platt, 2022;Trubetskoy et al, 2022;Taylor et al, 2022). Despite this causal complexity, a core tenet of clinical cognitive neuroscience is that psychiatric symptoms are an expression of potentially identifiable altered neurophysiological function (a proximate cause), reflecting a multiplicity of upstream biopsychosocial causal factors (Deisseroth, 2021).…”

Medications, Genes, Environmental Stress, and Pursuit of Recovery

“…The authors suggest in their conclusion that environmental factors play a greater role than genetic factors in the etiology of psychotic experiences in adolescents. Addressing the implications of their finding that “the relative importance of genetic influences on certain psychotic experiences diminished with more exposure to environmental risk factors,” they suggest that the study’s findings better support a “bioecological framework” than a “diathesis-stress” pathway for understanding adolescent psychotic experiences 5…”