“…The construction of BiVO 4 /WO 3 heterostructure was reported as one of the most effective ways to improve the electron–hole separation and transport, because of its type II band alignment at the interfaces. ,, For the heterostructure, WO 3 will provide conductive pathway for charge transfer, whereas BiVO 4 could absorb broad visible spectrum to facilitate light harvesting. , Hence, the structural configuration of WO 3 would play an essential role in the PEC performance of BiVO 4 /WO 3 composites. Among various WO 3 nanoarchitectures, the single-crystalline one-dimensional WO 3 nanorod is regarded as a promising candidate which can provide an enlarged surface area to maximize active sites and direct conduction pathways for generated charges with reduced charge recombination. , By integrating abundant branches on nanorods, photocatalytic activity can be further enhanced owing to its maximized redox-active sites and increased light-trapping characteristics, as revealed by previous efforts. − In recent years, various synthetic routes have been employed to prepare branched hierarchical WO 3 nanorods, including thermal evaporation of W powders, hot electrospinning with polystyrene-colloid-template, and hot-wire chemical vapor deposition . Although these methods could provide relatively acceptable control of hierarchical morphology, the demand of high thermal energy and/or vacuum environment hampers the cost-effective synthesis of large photoelectrochemical cells, which are critically important for real applications.…”