2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11299-008-0050-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneity in choices on Iowa Gambling Task: preference for infrequent–high magnitude punishment

Abstract: Decision-making, Individual differences, Information processing, Iowa Gambling Task, Reward-punishment,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the IGT, individuals experience rewards and punishments for selecting cards from decks that provide either high immediate rewards and larger punishments or smaller immediate rewards and smaller punishments. Advantageous decision making relies on shifting choices away from disadvantageous card decks toward advantageous card decks (41). We found that the low-normal TSH group initially made poor decisions compared to the high-normal TSH group (Net-1), but then the low-normal TSH group outperformed the high-normal TSH group with larger gains across subsequent trials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the IGT, individuals experience rewards and punishments for selecting cards from decks that provide either high immediate rewards and larger punishments or smaller immediate rewards and smaller punishments. Advantageous decision making relies on shifting choices away from disadvantageous card decks toward advantageous card decks (41). We found that the low-normal TSH group initially made poor decisions compared to the high-normal TSH group (Net-1), but then the low-normal TSH group outperformed the high-normal TSH group with larger gains across subsequent trials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…A net score of zero is chance performance. This task assesses real-life decision making and responses to rewards and punishments (41). D. Working memory tests.…”
Section: Tests Of Executive Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Também nesse sentido, Caroselli et al (2006) verificam que o poder atrativo de um baralho depende da frequência prévia de reforço e não da magnitude da recompensa. Em conclusão, a frequência é uma dimensão dominante no IGT, sendo por isso recomendada a sua análise (Huizenga et al, 2007;Singh & Khan, 2009;Schneider & Parente, 2006;Wagner & Parente, 2009).…”
Section: Avaliação De Desempenho No Igtunclassified
“…Could the conceptualization of risk and rationality advanced by the SMH–IGT framework—that is, risk as an intertemporal choice and rationality as making long term advantageous decisions—be a reflection of the environment where the task was developed and the cognitive demands of that environment? Decision making in the IGT is observed to be governed by frequency of reinforcement rather than the intertemporal attribute in several cultural contexts including Taiwan (Chiu and Lin, 2007; Lin et al, 2007; Chiu et al, 2008), Iran (Ekhtiari et al, 2009), Brazil (Schneider et al, 2010), and India (Singh and Khan, 2008). Future studies could utilize the IGT to understand cultural variations in risk perception and risk taking at the behavioral as well as the neural level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This preference is incompatible with the SMH–IGT framework as demonstrated, for example, by the finding that deck B′ was considered “risky” on the basis of the intertemporal attribute and is preferred to other “safe” decks (Lin et al, 2007), whereas deck C′ that was considered “safe” is avoided by healthy participants (Chiu and Lin, 2007). Furthermore, dispositional risk seekers who were assessed using a modified risk-taking scale (Domain-Specific Risk-Taking; Weber et al, 2002) preferred decks A′ and C′ and avoided decks B′ and D′ (Singh and Khan, 2008). Together, these findings suggest that, in the IGT, risk might be perceived in two ways, either by the intertemporal attribute or by frequency of reward and punishment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%