Heterogeneity in Organizational Hybridity: A Configurational, Situated, and Dynamic Approach

Abstract

As complex, intractable social problems continue to intensify, organizations increasingly respond with novel approaches that bridge multiple institutional spheres and combine forms, identities, and logics that would conventionally not go together, creating hybridity. Scholarly research on this phenomenon has expanded in tandem, raising questions about how the concept of organizational hybridity can maintain analytical clarity while accommodating a diverse range of empirical manifestations. Reviewing and integrating extant literature, the authors argue that to achieve both analytical rigor and real-world relevance, research must account for variation in how hybridity is organizationally configured, temporally situated, and institutionally embedded. The authors develop a framework that captures this heterogeneity and discuss three key implications for hybridity research: drawing on multiple theoretical lenses, examining varied empirical contexts, and adopting multi-level and dynamic perspectives.

How are Competing Logics Combined in Managerial Teams? The Impact of Branch Founding Team Hybridity on the Growth of Islamic Bank Branches in Turkey, 2002–19

“…Establishing this ‘bridge’ is important, because the consequences of hybrid organizing within an organization generally depend on the broader context that shapes the competition between oppositional logics and ideologies (Boone and Ozcan, 2016; Battilana et al, 2016; Greenwood et al, 2011; Lounsbury, 2007; Marquis and Lounsbury, 2007). Overall, our study also resonates with a recent call for a multilevel perspective in organizational hybridity research (Besharov and Mitzinneck, 2020).…”

“What is going on in the ‘big tent’?” Current developments in (new) institutional theory and performance measurement and management research

“…Therefore, Sven Modell's suggestions (Modell, 2021) to link PMM research to current “hot topics” in institutional theory such as hybrid organisations and hybrid organising seems to be a promising avenue (for recent developments see the recent volume of Research in the Sociology of Organizations, eds. Besharov and Mitzinneck, 2021). The recent symposium in Public Administration curated by Steccolini et al.…”

Democratizing Work: Redistributing power in organizations for a democratic and sustainable future

“…The evidence for this insight comes from the literature on hybrid organizing, which has often focused on organizations that simultaneously value social and environmental objectives alongside financial ones (for reviews, see Battilana, Besharov, & Mitzinneck, 2017;Battilana & Lee, 2014;Besharov & Mitzinneck, 2020). For these organizations, often called dual purpose or triple bottom line organizations, pursuing social, environmental, and financial objectives is central to who they are and what they do.…”